Why didn't this one sell?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Why didn't this one sell?

Post by octagon »

This Ryder 425 has to be worth $500.How come nobody bid on it?

Image
Last edited by octagon on Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by libratune »

Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.

I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by octagon »

libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.

I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
Ok,thanks Ron.Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
clementc3
Member
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:22 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by clementc3 »

octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.

In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."

Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.

In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.
Last edited by clementc3 on Thu Aug 26, 2010 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by Danotron »

The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by 8mileshigher »

I think the TRC on these Ryder guitars is somewhat of a detractor :( with it's shape and the script writing.
I guess I like the regular Ric TRC too much, to appreciate these private label alternatives.

All in all, the FG finish on that guitar does not look too bad for its age.
User avatar
BuddyDog
Intermediate Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:30 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by BuddyDog »

Danotron wrote:The seller has an interesting "rant" on the page too in red ink.
:twisted: Must be the Meg Whitman effect...
2009 360/6 Fire-Glo 2009 360/12C63 FG 1975 4001 White/BT
Chords mangled, no waiting!
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by octagon »

clementc3 wrote:
octagon wrote:Is that a rebadged Rickenbacker 425?
There are a number of threads about Ryder guitars on the Rickenbacker company forum that talk about the differences (or lack of differences) between Ryder guitars and Rickenbacker guitars.

In one discussion thread there John Hall says (and I hope I am not out of line quoting him here; if so, moderator, please edit or delete), "These guitars were produced under private label, in this case for a music school by that name. These are similar to Rickenbacker instruments but many have subtle difference, not the least of which is a lower level of finish to keep these affordable. They are NOT a Rickenbacker product as such."

Mr. Hall also describes some specific differences that the factory used in the finishing process for guitars that they manufactured under private label. Those differences notwithstanding, other knowledgeable owners have noted a high quality of finish on Ryder guitars.

In addition, just to make generalizations really difficult, Mr. Hall says elsewhere that the factory would occasionally put a "Electro" nameplate on a Rickenbacker if they were under a time crunch. However, I don't know if that is true of the private-label instruments such as Ryder.
Are the Electros different from the Ryders?

Image
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by libratune »

The comparable Electro model would be the ES-17, which usually had a set-neck, though there are also neck-thru Electros. The Ryder in the ebay ad is a neck-thru:
Ryder 425 back
Ryder 425 back
The TRCs look to be about the same shape:
Ryder 425 TRC
Ryder 425 TRC
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by octagon »

Pretty much.

Image

Image
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by libratune »

Of course, there is the occasional exception:
ES-17 Electro TRC
ES-17 Electro TRC
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by octagon »

libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
ES-17 64 425 Electro TRC.jpg
Maybe that is what Rickenbacker gives you as a replacement when you trade in a broken "Electro" TRC. :lol:
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by electrofaro »

libratune wrote:Click on "0 bids" on the ebay link and you will see there were 4 bids, all cancelled by the seller.

I contacted the seller about this and he said he received an offer he couldn't refuse, cancelled all the bids and ended the auction.
I hate when that happens! I was tracking a 250 and was mightily confused it was listed under ended when I came home - turns out it was ended early.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Malchik
New member
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by Malchik »

Ha, ha. I made arrangement with him to ship to Canada if I won. I figured he had a great offer sent to him.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Why didn't this one sell?

Post by jingle_jangle »

libratune wrote:Of course, there is the occasional exception:
ES-17 64 425 Electro TRC.jpg
Ryder TRCs were about 3/4" shorter than the Electro ones (the name is 2 letters shorter). The Electro ones made using the lap steel metal logo tags were on very early ESs and are rare, although not too pretty.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”