Thanks for the welcome... great place. I'm a passionate Rickenbacker fan and own and play a 1997 (year) 360/6 FG - but have a nice collection of Gibsons, Fenders and others.Wildberry wrote:Good point! And welcome to RRF, Troels!trosse wrote:templates for industrial use are made of hardened steel and the router that cuts the wood use a small wheel to follow the contures of the templates. There's no wear on the templates at all.
Still, what could cause the difference - different templates? Sanding?
Some "invisible" changes could be made to differ new guitars from vintage guitars preventing a too good base for some creative people for making fraud vintage guitars presented to naive eBay customers.
Anyway, I don't believe sanding makes the difference. You need a LOT of sanding to produce visible changes in the overall shape. The logical answer is different templates - but why it's impossible to take template A and make a copy - template B - and get them identical, is a mystery to me. Still that is what we have seen with for instance with Stratocasters (even the big changes here came when Fender installed numerically controlled routers in the early 70s - and even new "vintage" Strats are off shapewise).
From time to time I've heard the worn template song in relation to Gibson ES-335 and cousins - but here it makes even less sense as the rims of these guitars are assembled with the center block first. Top and back are glued on when the shape is already there as the overall shape of these guitars are formed by the router following the already glued and cures sides of the guitar.
Maybe John Hall can tell us about the small variations.