1993 Plus Feedback

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
kharri
New member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:53 pm

1993 Plus Feedback

Post by kharri »

Looking at a 1993 Plus.
I already own a 381/12, but was wondering how much different the 1993 would be?

Thanks
Kevin
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4254
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by libratune »

1993 Plus: wider and thicker one-piece neck (think 660-12) also X-braced interior + 3 pickups

381/12: standard neck width (same as 360) deeper hollow body

Those are main differences to me besides cosmetics
kharri
New member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:53 pm

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by kharri »

How about playability?

With the 381 I have problems holding down the E & A string sets.
The bass string is large and the octave string small, so when I push down harder it sometimes will mute out a close string.

I have small hands, but it still is difficult.

I was hoping the string spacing would be slightly larger and the playability would be improved.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by sloop_john_b »

kharri wrote:How about playability?

With the 381 I have problems holding down the E & A string sets.
The bass string is large and the octave string small, so when I push down harder it sometimes will mute out a close string.

I have small hands, but it still is difficult.

I was hoping the string spacing would be slightly larger and the playability would be improved.
It sounds like the wider neck would help! I prefer them.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by jdogric12 »

kharri wrote:How about playability?

With the 381 I have problems holding down the E & A string sets.
The bass string is large and the octave string small, so when I push down harder it sometimes will mute out a close string.

I have small hands, but it still is difficult.

I was hoping the string spacing would be slightly larger and the playability would be improved.
What gauge strings are you using down there? I stick to the RIC gauges for the most part - I think down at the low E and A they're 46/26 and 36/20w. Try 42/26 and 34/20w. If that still doesn't help, maybe your action is too high? Ricks usually like to be nice and flat and low.
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7094
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by scotty »

Got to play a 1993Plus when i last visited Graham and i really liked it.
Great player i thought it was nice.
Clifton
Junior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:54 pm

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by Clifton »

kharri wrote:Looking at a 1993 Plus.
I already own a 381/12, but was wondering how much different the 1993 would be?

Thanks
Kevin
I have a 330/12 and a 620/12. The 1993+ is so much easier to play than these guitars--it's a completely different vibe. Now I feel Rick should make all of their 12-string necks wider. What a great feeling neck!
kharri
New member
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:53 pm

Re: 1993 Plus Feedback

Post by kharri »

I ended up with one. The 1993 feel very different than the 381. For one thing the body thickness is less.
Also with the wider fretboard, playing it is much easier, even with small fingers.
I would recommend those looking at a 12 string to seriously consider the 1993.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”