Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Tube and solidstate amplifiers made by Rickenbacker

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (kvalois) » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:14 pm

Hi, everyone:

I'm looking for opinions. Which FENDER amp is best for that Beatles/Byrds sound? :D

Thanks, Karl
(kvalois)
Member
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (paologregorio) » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:17 pm

I believe you want a Showman or Dual Showman.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
(paologregorio)
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6317
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:56 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA, United States of America

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (sloop_john_b) » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:55 pm

Does it have to be gig volume or bedroom volume?
User avatar
(sloop_john_b)
Rick-a-holic
 
Posts: 13539
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (kvalois) » Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:09 pm

It doesn't have to be BIG. Maybe 20-25 watts or so. And, hopefully, under 50 lbs!!!!!

Karl
(kvalois)
Member
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (sloop_john_b) » Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:24 pm

kvalois wrote:It doesn't have to be BIG. Maybe 20-25 watts or so. And, hopefully, under 50 lbs!!!!!

Karl


How much are you looking to spend?
User avatar
(sloop_john_b)
Rick-a-holic
 
Posts: 13539
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (kvalois) » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:08 am

Up to $1,000
(kvalois)
Member
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 5:43 pm
Location: CT, USA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (w1nn1e) » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:11 pm

VOX AC -15 twin is what they used in the studio.
or a
VOX Pacemaker or Cambridge Reverb (tube or SS)
Fenders are too harsh and trebly and do not compress the sound as well as a VOX.
A Rickenbacker M-11 tube amp might do in a pinch...
(w1nn1e)
New member
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:22 pm

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (AndyM) » Sun Aug 12, 2012 9:37 am

I would think the Deluxe Reverb model has the most chime without getting too harsh in the jangly treble range. If that is the sound you want, you can buy the Boss FDR pedal for a lot less $$. It has vibrato controls to dial in jangle.
(AndyM)
New member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:06 pm

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (stsang) » Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:44 pm

I'd always thought The Beatles = Vox AC15/30/100 amps (in the studio and on stage); The Byrds = Fender amps (they used Showmans on stage).

So you may need to get two amps if you're very, very serious about perfectly nailing both The Beatles and The Byrds tones... Both bands also used studio effects such as studio compressors, reverbs on their records. Roger McGuinn claims to have DI'd his Ric + applied studio compression for The Byrds recordings rather than recording with an amp.
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
(stsang)
Member
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 1:47 pm
Location: Jersey City, NJ. USA.

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (doctorwho) » Sun Aug 12, 2012 4:26 pm

I my experience, a Fender amp with a Middle tone control gives a better sound than does an amp with only the Treble and Bass tone controls alone.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
(doctorwho)
Veteran RRF member
 
Posts: 12052
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:28 pm
Location: Costa Mesa, CA, USA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (Aclempoppi) » Mon Aug 13, 2012 4:52 am

Excellent discussion!!! Every time I saw McQuinn, it was Twin Reverbs, from the mid 60's to the 90's. But that was stage work. Just want to know where you guys are, as far as, Class A amps goes. Got a 2012 360-12 string last may. Play it through mid '60 Fenders. But thinkin' about a 15watt Class A amp. As an amp tech-player, Matchless or Badcat seem to be the logical choice. Seems you folks prefer the Vox amps, but I just can't live with the heat and reliability issues. My question would be whether or not the class A amp really compliments the 12-strng? Have a 1955 class A 5-watt 2X10 amp, but that makes any guitar a stone-soul player! Thanks, Art
(Aclempoppi)
New member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:28 am
Location: Harvard, IL

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (Aclempoppi) » Mon Aug 13, 2012 6:50 am

My bad, karl !!! Got to self-centered. A Twin Reverb would certainly take care of stage needs. A Showman( another 100watt amp) would also do the job. Actually, a good 2X6L6 Fender will provide the juice. It does come down to the speakers. Their effecicency and obviously the configuration really determines the sonic result. And that's your call ! You know what I mean? ( 4X12, 2X12, 4X10, 2X10, etc) JMO, Art
(Aclempoppi)
New member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:28 am
Location: Harvard, IL

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (kawalsh) » Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:01 am

I have a Fender Super 112, a dreaded red knob tube amp from the 80's. It is a great amp. I have 3 fenders and a Rickenbacker Transonic 200, as well as an RG180, and have owned a Vox AC15 and some Mesa's. I sold the Vox because the Fender Super 112 could do anything the Vox could do. It has extremely active tone controls, unlike the Hot Rod Deluxe I also use, and has a great presence control which when pulled out becomes a sweepable notch filter. This is where you can dial in some really nice tones. I also have a 94 Twin that is loud and sounds pretty good, but no match for the super 112 in tone. They (red knob models) can be found for really good prices because some of the Fender amps from that era apparently sucked, like the red knob Twin. Many of the amps from that era are also solid state, but this is all tube. Downside is that it is heavy, with huge transformers. Anyway this amp is versatile, powerful and not big (1-12). I see them in the $300- $400 dollar range, so a good value too. You will want to change the ugly grey grill cloth, but it will probably need it anyway.
(kawalsh)
New member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 11:52 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (doctorwho) » Thu Aug 16, 2012 3:49 am

In case you want to consider a brand other than Fender, I highly recommend the current Kustom '36 Coupe. Rated at 36 watts and using two 6L6WXT+ (IIRC) power tubes, these are (IMO) equivalent to the classic Fender tube amps (Accutronics spring reverb! :D ) and they have modern perks (e.g., an XLR line out, dual foot-switchable channels ...).

P1010165.JPG
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
(doctorwho)
Veteran RRF member
 
Posts: 12052
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 4:28 pm
Location: Costa Mesa, CA, USA

Re: Which Fender amp for the Beatles/Byrds sound?

Postby (jps) » Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:59 am

doctorwho wrote:In case you want to consider a brand other than Fender, I highly recommend the current Kustom '36 Coupe. Rated at 36 watts and using two 6L6WXT+ (IIRC) power tubes, these are (IMO) equivalent to the classic Fender tube amps (Accutronics spring reverb! :D ) and they have modern perks (e.g., an XLR line out, dual foot-switchable channels ...).

P1010165.JPG

It also come with a back rest, I see.
(Insert famous quote here)
User avatar
(jps)
RRF Consultant
 
Posts: 35170
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Not of this Earth

Next

Return to Rickenbacker Amplifiers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests