'66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

'66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by sloop_john_b »

I made a couple of quick videos to compare the tones of my two Rick 12's, the re-necked '66 360/12MG and my old '04 660/12 Blue Boy.

Both guitars are running through my Vox AC-30 CC (Wharfdale speakers) with the settings untouched.

Both guitars are strung up with TI Jazz Flats and have had them for just about the same amount of time (2-3 months).

Both guitars are running the bridge pickup only - a new scatterwound 7.4kohm toaster.

No effects. Camera placed in just about the same spot.

The difference we're hearing - if any - is solidbody vs. hollowbody and late 80's wiring vs. new wiring. Also, it'll be interesting to see whether or not the oven knobs make a difference over the silver-tops. :lol:

The tune is a very short version of one of my songs, which is usually played with a capo at the 5th fret (key of F), but I decided to forego the capo for this. You may notice, however, that the 360/12 has a capo at the 2nd fret - this is because I keep it tuned down a whole step.

First, the 660/12:



The 360/12:



So, what kind of difference do you guys hear? Any? Which one do you prefer?
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by JakeK »

I heard a small difference -- the 360 being more open rather than the 660. Were you using any compression of some sort?

Owning a 660, you'd think I'd lean on it...I'm torn between the two! :P
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by sloop_john_b »

No effects Jake. The 660/12 certainly has a "tightness" and top-end sparkle that the 360/12 does not - for better or for worse.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by jwilli »

JakeK wrote:I heard a small difference -- the 360 being more open rather than the 660.
+1.

I liked them both, they just sound a tad different. Just like all of my Ricks!
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by sloop_john_b »

Ease of play goes to the 360/12. I may have finally "outgrown" the 660/12 neck, if that makes any sense.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by jps »

I think the 360 has a sweeter tone, not as harsh when you dig into the strings. It even sounded better while just sitting on your seat before picking it up.
User avatar
goofyfoot
Intermediate Member
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:31 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by goofyfoot »

JB......Hmmm, I've got my Mac laptop hooked up to a Klipsch iFi and the sounds are bouncing off my walls, man. Good stuff! The 360 seems to have more tonal depth, a more rounded sound, and slightly darker residue. It oozes earthiness.......really organic-sounding. The 620 has a noticeably sparkling, trebly quality to it and just a skosh more sustain. Forced to choose between the two, I dig what you accomplished on the 360. Just my dos centavos' worth.

Keep on keepin' on, brah......Goofyfoot.
Last edited by goofyfoot on Wed Aug 27, 2008 1:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Play on, pick often, jam with any Rickenbacker, and prosper.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by antipodean »

I prefer the brightness of the 660, though the 360 sounds great as well.

The "hand at the camera" end to the first clip reminds me of some tabloid TV shows.... have you had practice with the paparazzi John? :mrgreen:
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by sloop_john_b »

antipodean wrote:I prefer the brightness of the 660, though the 360 sounds great as well.

The "hand at the camera" end to the first clip reminds me of some tabloid TV shows.... have you had practice with the paparazzi John? :mrgreen:
Haha! I suppose some very simple editing probably would have taken care of that. I'm planning to do a better version of this type of comparison soon.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by kiramdear »

jps wrote:I think the 360 has a sweeter tone, not as harsh when you dig into the strings. It even sounded better while just sitting on your seat before picking it up.
+1 :lol:
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13099
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by rickenbrother »

Both guitars sound great, but I think like the tone of the 360/12 a little more.
The JETGLO finish name should be officially changed to JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7094
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by scotty »

Thinking the 360 is a more rounded solid punch whilst the 660 glimmers like broken glass! I want to like the 360 but the 660 kicks you in the guts and thats what i like! 660 for me.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by deaconblues »

360/12 all the way...less piercing than the 660 to my ears.

Wish I could get my hands on one of those 21-fretters!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by jingle_jangle »

It would have been interesting as a fully-blind test...so we didn't know which was which. A bit less biased when you don't know which one you're hearing...

In any event, a narrow-necked vintage semi-hollowbody and a wide-necked nearly-new solidbody are about as far apart in the 12-string playing spectrum as you can get, Rick-wise. Which do you prefer from a player's standpoint, John?
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: '66 360/12RM?? vs. '04 660/12

Post by ken_j »

Although both sound great I prefer the 360.
"The best things in life aren't things."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”