How does this neck angle look? 60s 360/12 content

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
danoadam
Junior Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:46 am

How does this neck angle look? 60s 360/12 content

Post by danoadam »

Hey guys! I'm talking with a guy online about buying his 60s 360/12 and I'm concerned about the neck angle. The action looks kinda high and the saddles look like they're filed pretty low maybe? What do you guys think?

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: How does this neck angle look? 60s 360/12 content

Post by jdogric12 »

Looks low but I've seen [read: owned] worse.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: How does this neck angle look? 60s 360/12 content

Post by collin »

No mistake about it - the neck angle is visibly shallow. But the vast majority of these guitars are like that, especially most 12-strings between 1964-1967.

The bridge height is irrelevant until you adjust the action down to a normal (low) level, then you can really see where it's at.

Personally, I wouldn't shy away from the guitar, but don't pay too much since it could likely get worse over time. Under $3000 would be a realistic price in this condition. There are a few options to help eliminate or slow the neck creeping forward, including use of ultra light-gauge strings, which should be required for all these early 12-string Ricks.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: How does this neck angle look? 60s 360/12 content

Post by jdogric12 »

Make sure the pics you're seeing are at full tension, and maybe get a return option for if the neck is not "as advertised."
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”