.0047 capacitor

Setup, repair and restoration of Rickenbacker Instruments

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by stsang »

I would add that the effects of the cap seem to work best with toaster pickups, and then really only for 12-string guitars. Then again, all those early The Jam, The Smiths and R.E.M. records use high-gain 6-string Rics equipped with the cap. Just sayin'... 8)
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37139
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by jps »

stsang wrote:I would add that the effects of the cap seem to work best with toaster pickups, and then really only for 12-string guitars....
Actually, the cap works great with magnetic (and otherwise) horseshoe pickups, too, for bass. :wink:
User avatar
whojamfan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2552
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:50 am
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by whojamfan »

I find it's best to have the cap on a pushpull pot so you have a choice. I also have found what works best for me, when using the cap, is to think of the guitar as only having a middle position, and roll in the neck to taste with the fifth knob. I find the bridge pickup by itself to be very lacking with the cap on. I have a 360-12 with toasters in it.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by johnhall »

[quote="paologregorio]. . .to the lower output 3 ohm neck pickup.[/quote]

That's a different pickup entirely, one we call the "Low Gain".
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12522
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by doctorwho »

johnhall wrote:[quote="paologregorio]. . .to the lower output 3 ohm neck pickup.
That's a different pickup entirely, one we call the "Low Gain".[/quote][/quote][/quote]
:lol: So Paulie's off by a factor of 1000, no big deal, right? :lol:

(Ironically, I was looking at results last week from an outside lab that were 300 times greater than what we've gotten in house ... :roll: )
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by johnallg »

johnhall wrote:[quote="paologregorio]. . .to the lower output 3 ohm neck pickup.
That's a different pickup entirely, one we call the "Low Gain".[/quote][/quote]
Lower than a Lace too. :lol:
User avatar
IHeartRics
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by IHeartRics »

whojamfan wrote:I also have found what works best for me, when using the cap, is to think of the guitar as only having a middle position, and roll in the neck to taste with the fifth knob. I find the bridge pickup by itself to be very lacking with the cap on. I have a 360-12 with toasters in it.
Totally agree. I did try the cap in my 620 that had hi gains and didn't really like it, but then again I'm not a big fan of the hi gains. Not that they are bad, just not my taste. But in my 330/12 with toasters and my 480's I love it.
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by stsang »

From observing all the comments, it looks like folks fall into one of two camps:

1. Janglers / 60s vintage sound lovers / 12-string users: prefer the cap with toasters and use the middle switch position + 5th knob to blend in the neck PU
2. Hard drivin' rockers / 6-string users / high gain PU folks / pedals/effects lovers: hate the cap and think it is the worst thing ever to happen to their guitar

I'm definitely in camp #1, but I have no problem with those in camp #2. The great thing is Rickenbacker can deliver to both camps! :D
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
IHeartRics
Member
Posts: 482
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:17 am
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by IHeartRics »

stsang wrote:From observing all the comments, it looks like folks fall into one of two camps:

1. Janglers / 60s vintage sound lovers / 12-string users: prefer the cap with toasters and use the middle switch position + 5th knob to blend in the neck PU
2. Hard drivin' rockers / 6-string users / high gain PU folks / pedals/effects lovers: hate the cap and think it is the worst thing ever to happen to their guitar

I'm definitely in camp #1, but I have no problem with those in camp #2. The great thing is Rickenbacker can deliver to both camps! :D
3. Other / My guitar is set up like camp 1 but I push and play it like camp 2! :twisted: :lol:
Expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed (and I mean that in an optimistic way).
http://www.reverbnation.com/thelowlies
http://www.myspace.com/thelowlies
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6371
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by paologregorio »

johnhall wrote:[quote="paologregorio]. . .to the lower output 3 ohm neck pickup.
That's a different pickup entirely, one we call the "Low Gain".[/quote][/quote]

It's a very sweet sounding neck pickup. :D

I used the guitar tonight to re-record the 12 string track for one of the songs on our new recording; the guitar sounds amazing. :)
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
johncorth
New member
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:42 am
Contact:

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by johncorth »

stsang wrote:Without the cap, the center position sounds quite different from either the neck or the bridge pickup on its own. The best I can describe it is a little bit 'bubblegum' or 'quacky' (sorry it's hard to describe in words). With the cap, the center position sounds more like a blend of the two pickups rather than a different sound.
That's interesting. I've noticed that Rickenbackers I've had (mostly vintage, all with the cap) didn't do the quacky thing in the middle position. So it's the cap. next time I have a Rickenbacker, I'm going to do the push-pull pot for the cap.
rhschenato
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:52 am

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by rhschenato »

Hi! This is my first participation here in the forum. I have a '78 Ric 4001 and recently I took off the 0047 capacitor. In fact, without the cap, when in the center position the bass really sounds different. It's really hard to describe. In my opinion, the tone reminds me an active bass, and since of that every time I play I prefer to set the bridge pickup volume control with a little less volume, which, I suppose, increase the main volume of the bass. What do you think about? And about the basses produced from 1984 to the present day, which don't have the cap anymore? There is any difference between the tone of these and older basses? I'm really not sure whether to put the capacitor back. Thanks and congratulations for the forum, really useful!
Folkie
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: .0047 capacitor

Post by Folkie »

I guess I'm still not entirely clear on how the cap changes the function of the fifth (blend) knob. The blend knob on my 360/12 usually stays in about the middle or slightly counterclockwise from the middle position. My guitar is equipped with 7.4K toasters, so I find that if I push the guitar, I can reach treble overload. For that reason, I suspect the cap probably wouldn't be good for me. How exactly does the cap change the way the fifth knob works? (I'm sorry if this question has already been answered here, but I'm still a little confused.) :oops:
Post Reply

Return to “"Vibrola" Rickenbacker Technical Forum: By Paul Wilczynski”