.0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Benjamin
Junior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by Benjamin »

I'd say a 1997 is 330K as well.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by johnallg »

Benjamin wrote:I'd say a 1997 is 330K as well.
A 1997 would have the 250k (~190k) volume and the 500k (~420k) tone pots in it.
Benjamin
Junior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by Benjamin »

johnallg wrote:
Benjamin wrote:I'd say a 1997 is 330K as well.
A 1997 would have the 250k (~190k) volume and the 500k (~420k) tone pots in it.
Interesting. How does that kind of setup compare with all 330K? Thumpier/fatter tone as the 80s and 90s 4003 were known for or? My 2000 is a nice middle ground. Since installing the cap and push-pull I can achieve a lot of tones, in standard mode mine is fairly thick sounding with still a nice bite.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by johnallg »

Benjamin wrote:
johnallg wrote:
Benjamin wrote:I'd say a 1997 is 330K as well.
A 1997 would have the 250k (~190k) volume and the 500k (~420k) tone pots in it.
Interesting. How does that kind of setup compare with all 330K? Thumpier/fatter tone as the 80s and 90s 4003 were known for or? My 2000 is a nice middle ground. Since installing the cap and push-pull I can achieve a lot of tones, in standard mode mine is fairly thick sounding with still a nice bite.
Your 2000 would have the 250k/500k pots, unless it was modified at sometime.
Benjamin
Junior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by Benjamin »

johnallg wrote:Your 2000 would have the 250k/500k pots, unless it was modified at sometime.
Curiosity got the better of me. My 330K official Rickenbacker CTS push-pull pot measures 512K!

Started new thread... viewtopic.php?f=2&t=411868
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by iiipopes »

Benjamin wrote:If I recall, for my 2000 model I ordered the official 330K pot from Pick Of The Ricks no problem - and shipped to Australia.
I was advised against using an orange drop, so a fellow member here sold me a Sprague paper and oil. You should be able to find one on Ebay. More expensive but I am told they're better. I noticed a slight and worthwhile improvement over the original orange drop I installed to test.
The orange drop, being a mylar capacitor, will have a much longer life than the paper-and-oil, which will dry out and deteriorate over time. I use orange drops, not because they have any mystical mojo, but because I like a .033 tone cap to retain more mids in the mix when I turn down the tone knob, and that is a lesser expensive and more readily available capacitor. Capacitance is capacitance. The only issue is whether or not the manufacturer has a sufficient reputation for quality control, so when you purchase a capacitor of the stated value, it truly is within the manufacturing tolerances of that capacitor.
nhoorweg
New member
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 9:50 am

Re: .0047 cap and push/pull pot 'substitute'?

Post by nhoorweg »

Hi folks, sorry for my lack of participation in this thread, after being the one to start it. I've had some other stuff going on (like getting married).

To update: I went ahead and ordered the push/pull kit from The Rickenbacker Page (Music Connection), despite the expensive shipping - used some wedding gift money :) It took about a month for it to arrive, and I just had my luthier install it on Monday. Only just got a chance to use it on a gig tonight as everything else I've had has been on upright.

All I can say is... WOW! I LOVE this mod! It's by far and away my preferred tone, serious 60's vibe now. I love that the toaster becomes the dominant bottom end sound. And so great to have the option of re-engaging the regular cap for extra horseshoe bottom end if needed.

Not exactly sure why they stopped using that cap in the first place...?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”