78 vs 79 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
ch willie
Junior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:13 pm

78 vs 79 4001

Post by ch willie »

Are there any differences between the 78 and 79 4001?

I've searched, and I read on Ric's forum that in 79 the headstock logo became raised letters instead of the plexi covered logo like it is on my 78.

I think the original pickups were defective. The bridge pickup had no body, and it was incredibly weak. I put in the toaster and horse shoes, and it came to life. I find them a lot more powerful than the original pups, even the neck pickup.
All the world's a stage, albeit with mountains, plains, oceans, rivers, buildings, towers, animals, humans, plants, and Armour's Spam.
User avatar
Dirk
Member
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:06 pm

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by Dirk »

I ordered a '79 4001 MG new from the House of Guitars (on layaway) and it indeed had raised letters on the TR cover.
Other than that I don't know of any other differences.

That would be a cool factoid to know.

I eventually sold it to my room mate which funded my '69, so basically an even trade! Really wish I still had both.

Speaking of pickups, had an old Hi-A (pre-bartolini) in the neck on the '69, and a pair of Bartolinis in my '81 4003.
No shaming of other pickups from me.

Dirk
farace
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by farace »

I had a February 1978 4001 (until it was stolen in ’89), and it had raised letters on the TRC. I’m pretty sure my buddy’s ’76 also had a raised logo. I would think that a previous owner may have swapped covers on yours.
--Bob

2015 4003 FG
1992 4003FL FG
1983 4003 WAL

Gone (stolen) but not forgotten, 1978 4001 WHT
User avatar
ch willie
Junior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by ch willie »

farace wrote:I had a February 1978 4001 (until it was stolen in ’89), and it had raised letters on the TRC. I’m pretty sure my buddy’s ’76 also had a raised logo. I would think that a previous owner may have swapped covers on yours.
No, I bought mine brand new on Christmas Eve in 1978. But you know how guitar factories are--leftover necks from a previous year on current year bodies.

But, what I read said it only changed in 79. This was discussed by people who own them. I don't know the exact link, but I did a search on Talkbass for 78 79 4001.

I am such a newbie to the history of the instrument that I wouldn't stake my big toe on that info.
All the world's a stage, albeit with mountains, plains, oceans, rivers, buildings, towers, animals, humans, plants, and Armour's Spam.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by sloop_john_b »

ch willie wrote:Are there any differences between the 78 and 79 4001?

I've searched, and I read on Ric's forum that in 79 the headstock logo became raised letters instead of the plexi covered logo like it is on my 78.

I think the original pickups were defective. The bridge pickup had no body, and it was incredibly weak. I put in the toaster and horse shoes, and it came to life. I find them a lot more powerful than the original pups, even the neck pickup.
A plexi TRC is NOT stock on a 1978 4001. These were phased out in 1975.

Edit: Just saw that you're a lefty! In that case, plexi it is, was, and always will be. :D
Last edited by sloop_john_b on Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
farace
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 1:35 pm

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by farace »

ch willie wrote:
farace wrote:I had a February 1978 4001 (until it was stolen in ’89), and it had raised letters on the TRC. I’m pretty sure my buddy’s ’76 also had a raised logo. I would think that a previous owner may have swapped covers on yours.
No, I bought mine brand new on Christmas Eve in 1978. But you know how guitar factories are--leftover necks from a previous year on current year bodies.

But, what I read said it only changed in 79. This was discussed by people who own them. I don't know the exact link, but I did a search on Talkbass for 78 79 4001.

I am such a newbie to the history of the instrument that I wouldn't stake my big toe on that info.
I just noticed the lefty in your avatar. Perhaps they hadn’t gotten around to making lefty raised-letter TRCs yet?
--Bob

2015 4003 FG
1992 4003FL FG
1983 4003 WAL

Gone (stolen) but not forgotten, 1978 4001 WHT
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6553
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by bassduke49 »

They never got around to making a lefty raised letter TRC - ever. There are no lefty raised-letter TRCs. The mold made for the raised-letter TRC is for right-handed instruments, and if I am not mistaken, is a universal item that fits most right-handed basses and guitars. Some trimming may be needed. The mold MAY be several "up" - that is the mold may be capable of having more than one TRC cast on the same shot. The mold also allows for castings in different color plastic, such as the black ones applied to 4004 and some other models.

All the lefty TRCs have been back-painted clear acrylic, either the original lefty "smiley" or the current "frowny."
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2902
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by ilan »

ch willie wrote: I think the original pickups were defective. The bridge pickup had no body, and it was incredibly weak. I put in the toaster and horse shoes, and it came to life. I find them a lot more powerful than the original pups, even the neck pickup.
That would have been the cap. Your bass had a stock .0047μF bass-cut capacitor on the bridge pickup. Just shunt it - it's the smallest of the 3 caps, no need to even remove from the harness - and you will not believe the difference.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by rickinroma »

The February 78 4001 I used to own, had a raised letters TRC
radapaw
Junior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: 78 vs 79 4001

Post by radapaw »

I'm under the impression back painted plexi covers pop up randomly for at least a few years when they would run out of raised covers at the factory and had to produce more....(I've got a 1980 that has what I believe is a stock backpainted cover). I think the plexi cover remained in place for black and lefties for quite a while.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”