Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
beacon
Junior Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:26 am

Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by beacon »

IMG_0591.JPG
I have a C64 originally purchased from Pick Of The Rics. It is one of only five white ones made for them. Tail lift has become extreme. All of my Rics have some, most is minor. I'm considering the new Ric bridge/tailpiece as a solution, but have concerns about drilling into what is a pretty rare bass....what would you do?
No matter where you go, no matter what you do, there you are.
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by ricosound »

I have the opposite issue as I was looking at one of the new 2020 checkerboard 4003's and was wondering if the vintage bridge retrofits? Sorry to hijack but the entire matter of how to switch back and forth V1 or V2 seems relevant.
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by thx1955 »

I'd opt for the new tailpiece, yes, you do need to drill new (additional holes) but the kit comes with a neat template to locate and facilitate placement.

The other option would be to find an early 70's cast Aluminium tailpiece, or, you could opt for a Hipshot which drops in with no additional drilling required.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3731
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by ram »

I did the V2 on my '74 4001. Was a piece of cake to install. Yes you need to drill a couple of holes and solder the ground wire. You can put the old one back on and I believe it will cover the new holes, if you so desire. The V2 intonates very easily and looks good. I like it.
Last edited by ram on Fri Jan 15, 2021 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
radapaw
Junior Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by radapaw »

If the V1 wasn't causing issues for you before the lift, I would stick with that before looking to fix a not broken thing. the v2 is fine and good but 'works' a lot different... kind of 'incorrect' to put it on a vintage reissue imho...like putting an emg in a 60's lespaul.
bluewhale
Member
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:05 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by bluewhale »

radapaw wrote:If the V1 wasn't causing issues for you before the lift, I would stick with that before looking to fix a not broken thing. the v2 is fine and good but 'works' a lot different... kind of 'incorrect' to put it on a vintage reissue imho...like putting an emg in a 60's lespaul.
I know what you mean, but the three-screw bridges these shipped with, some of them at least, are even less correct because they bend.

I am the original owner of 4001 C64 White #4, and here is my thread on the same topic, if anyone's interested:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=416568

I bought one of the new bridges, but I am waiting for a convenient time to install it. It will be a husband-and-wife project. She is the craftier one, and I am reluctant to proceed without her participation. I plan to post pictures of the work here if successful.


bluewhale
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by jps »

bluewhale wrote:
radapaw wrote:I plan to post pictures of the work here if successful.


bluewhale
Some of us may be more interested in photos if the project goes awry :mrgreen: , which is rather unlikely. It's just drilling a few holes and mounting the parts. 8)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4708
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by cassius987 »

I think the redesign is really well done, so my vote goes to V2, especially if you're getting tailpiece lift.
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by lumgimfong »

On the new bridge Is the mute now instant on/off, or do you still have to use the two screws to make it go up/down?
User avatar
beacon
Junior Member
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 7:26 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by beacon »

Definitely leaning towards the new V2 bridge. The lift is so bad as to make the bass unplayable. I'm pretty sure you can't even get the V1 any longer (at least new). Even if I could I doubt that is the right solution. Oddly, I'm more concerned about soldering than I am drilling the holes. To limit the depth simply put some painter's tape on the bit at the 'not to exceed' depth and stop when the tape reaches the correct depth.
No matter where you go, no matter what you do, there you are.
User avatar
Isaac
Member
Posts: 440
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:24 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by Isaac »

lumgimfong wrote:On the new bridge Is the mute now instant on/off, or do you still have to use the two screws to make it go up/down?
Still screws on my 4003AC.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4708
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by cassius987 »

lumgimfong wrote:On the new bridge Is the mute now instant on/off, or do you still have to use the two screws to make it go up/down?
Still uses the screws. Would love instant on/off but would be really hard to implement well, I would think. I would prefer to just have nothing there but a space to insert some foam under the strings, or something like a Nordymute.
beacon wrote:To limit the depth simply put some painter's tape on the bit at the 'not to exceed' depth and stop when the tape reaches the correct depth.
Yep! Works like a charm.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2707
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by henry5 »

Would someone with a V2 be able to measure the height from the base of the bridge to the bottom of the ‘slots’ in the mute area of the bridge, i.e. where the strings go through? I’d like to see if the string will go as low as on the old bridges. One bonus is the sides of the slots seem to be steeper, giving more clearance at the sides if you have slightly narrower spacing, like me.

The other thing I’d be interested to know is whether the template provided also works for basses with the old aluminium bridge. I tend to go backwards and forwards with string gauge and type and have always found the old bridge/tailpiece system a bit of a pain to readjust. It would be cool if you could fairly easily retrofit the V2 bridge, with a view to putting the old one back on if you ever sell the bass.
Guzzitd63
New member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:23 pm

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by Guzzitd63 »

henry5 wrote:Would someone with a V2 be able to measure the height from the base of the bridge to the bottom of the ‘slots’ in the mute area of the bridge, i.e. where the strings go through?
Hi Henry.
I'm getting 8.60mm on three and 8.40mm on one (The E string slot.)
I'm not sure if they did that on purpose or not.
I didn't measure the "back" slots but I'd assume they are the same.

*edit* Oh. ~9.35mm wide with a full 4.68mm Radius at the bottom.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2707
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Bridge/Tailpiece V2 or not?

Post by henry5 »

Guzzitd63 wrote:
henry5 wrote:Would someone with a V2 be able to measure the height from the base of the bridge to the bottom of the ‘slots’ in the mute area of the bridge, i.e. where the strings go through?
Hi Henry.
I'm getting 8.60mm on three and 8.40mm on one (The E string slot.)
I'm not sure if they did that on purpose or not.
I didn't measure the "back" slots but I'd assume they are the same.

*edit* Oh. ~9.35mm wide with a full 4.68mm Radius at the bottom.
That’s really great, very much appreciated. I’ll check my old bridges today, see how they compare.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”