Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
by (jps) » Tue Feb 16, 2021 2:05 pm
cheyenne wrote:I think its amazing how much better the 1/2" inch neck PU spacing looks compared to the modern version.
I know its only a half inch, but if your a RIC fan, you can notice it a mile away.
Don't forget the tonal differences, too (for some of us, anyway).
-

(jps)
- RRF Consultant
-
- Posts: 36474
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Location: Not of this Earth
by (cassius987) » Tue Feb 16, 2021 11:01 pm
It absolutely sounds different. I don't think I prefer it to the 1'' sound necessarily, but both are good. For a while a lot of neck pickups on Ric basses seemed weak and at one point I equated this to the 1'' position, but with current basses I don't hear this issue anymore.
I do still have the 1/2'' spacing on my 4001FL and plan to keep i that way.
-

(cassius987)
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 4683
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
by (jps) » Wed Feb 17, 2021 12:07 pm
My Rickenbacker upbringing was my 4005WB with its neck toaster right up against the neck. I play open, and pinched, harmonics quite often, and pickup location makes a big difference in that regard.
-

(jps)
- RRF Consultant
-
- Posts: 36474
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Location: Not of this Earth
by (Isaac) » Wed Feb 17, 2021 1:10 pm
I have never liked the look of the ½" spacing. I much prefer the 1" from that perspective.
As far as sound, I can't say. I've never had the pleasure of playing a Ric with the ½" spacing. I will say that I don't really love the sound of my 4004Cii neck pickup, nestled snug up against the neck. It's not bad, mind you, and it's a useful sound, but it's not my favorite.
-

(Isaac)
- Member
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:24 am
by (jps) » Wed Feb 17, 2021 7:20 pm
Isaac wrote:...I don't really love the sound of my 4004Cii neck pickup, nestled snug up against the neck. It's not bad, mind you, and it's a useful sound, but it's not my favorite.
Try a toaster.
-

(jps)
- RRF Consultant
-
- Posts: 36474
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Location: Not of this Earth
by (teeder) » Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:13 am
jps wrote:Isaac wrote:...I don't really love the sound of my 4004Cii neck pickup, nestled snug up against the neck. It's not bad, mind you, and it's a useful sound, but it's not my favorite.
Try a toaster.
Yeah, completely different animals.
-
(teeder)
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 6066
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am
by (ibal) » Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:17 am
gregson62 wrote:Limited Edition Bass. I had neck issues and the factory fret work was quite poor. There was a lot to work with, so I was able to sort it all out myself. I routed the body to move the neck pickup. Changes were done over 3 years ago and the bass has been the most stable Rickenbacker I have ever owned.
4003_AMB_CB_VP_Headstock.jpg
4003_AMB_CB_VP.JPG
Bass features a Pickguardian pickguard and tug bar, Dane WIlder vintage wiring harness and modified tail piece, Lollar Horseshoe pickup, an older Rickenbacker toaster pickup, and a host of restored vintage hardware sourced from various places. I have a plexi pickguard, as well, but prefer the stock style vintage white version. I have a 'volute style' vintage treble pickup surround that is back from the chromer and will soon have a custom pick guard, but I really love this bass 'as is'.
I'm very glad I didn't give up on this bass.
Did you cut a gap in the tailpiece? If so, how did you do it?
-
(ibal)
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 6:31 pm
by (Isaac) » Thu Feb 18, 2021 3:45 pm
jps wrote:Isaac wrote:...I don't really love the sound of my 4004Cii neck pickup, nestled snug up against the neck. It's not bad, mind you, and it's a useful sound, but it's not my favorite.
Try a toaster.
I'm using the neck pickup as a single coil already. Had to, as one of the coils is open. No idea how close a toaster might be to half of an HB-1.
-

(Isaac)
- Member
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:24 am
by (jps) » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:10 pm
Isaac wrote:jps wrote:Isaac wrote: No idea how close a toaster might be to half of an HB-1.
I have no idea, either, but the basic construction is totally different between the two pickups (regardless of one or two coils in the HB-1 being active, so to speak).
-

(jps)
- RRF Consultant
-
- Posts: 36474
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am
- Location: Not of this Earth
by (aceonbass) » Fri Feb 19, 2021 2:31 am
I picked up the 1st in that run of Sweetwater 4003SMCB basses, but went a different route with my mods. I replaced the hi-gains with HB1's and appropriately spec'd wiring with push-pull coil taps, a push-pull vintage tone control on the bridge pickup, and a push-pull pot on the neck tone to engage a .01uF tone cap. I also made black acrylic guard and replaced the truss rod cover with a black one from a 4004L. The single dual action truss rod these come with is not replaceable without removing the fingerboard.
- Attachments
-

-

(aceonbass)
- Veteran RRF member
-
- Posts: 6578
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
- Location: Parkville, Missouri
-
by (bassduke49) » Fri Feb 19, 2021 12:27 pm
Looks great, Dane! Wait . . . great Dane . . . hmm.
So the design of the new truss rod doesn't all for its easy removal? They must have a lot of faith in it not failing. Anyone have a graphic on how this type works? I'm having trouble understanding how it operates.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
-

(bassduke49)
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
- Location: Cedarburg, WI, USA
by (Hornbrille) » Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:43 pm
bassduke49 wrote:Looks great, Dane!
I second that! The HB1 bridge pickup with the chrome bezel just looks gorgeous.
1977 Fender Mustang Bass | 1978 Fender Jazz Bass | 1979 Guild B-302 | 1997 Rickenbacker 4001V63 | 2006 Rickenbacker 4003
-

(Hornbrille)
- New member
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 7:13 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
by (aceonbass) » Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:27 am
bassduke49 wrote:So the design of the new truss rod doesn't allow for its easy removal? They must have a lot of faith in it not failing. Anyone have a graphic on how this type works? I'm having trouble understanding how it operates.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ad8nqm5qP6A
-

(aceonbass)
- Veteran RRF member
-
- Posts: 6578
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
- Location: Parkville, Missouri
-
by (bassduke49) » Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:00 pm
Thanks, Dane.

Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
-

(bassduke49)
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 6444
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
- Location: Cedarburg, WI, USA
by (henry5) » Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:19 pm
bassduke49 wrote:Looks great, Dane! Wait . . . great Dane . . . hmm.
So the design of the new truss rod doesn't all for its easy removal? They must have a lot of faith in it not failing. Anyone have a graphic on how this type works? I'm having trouble understanding how it operates.
Probably like 99% of the rest of the truss rods on the planet Paul!
-

(henry5)
- Advanced Member
-
- Posts: 2596
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am
- Location: blackpool, lancashire, england
Return to Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests