To Pan or Blend

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
darrin7
New member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:38 pm

To Pan or Blend

Post by darrin7 »

lots of info out there on this subject. Now, is there a difference between a PAN & a BLEND knob & what is the advantage, if any between VVT & Pan / Blend setup ?
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3731
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by ram »

I'm no expert but this seems to outline it as I understand it:
http://guitarnuts2.proboards.com/thread ... d-pan-pots

I have a 4004C where Dane Wilder made me a hot harness replacing the switch with a blend knob. I love the single Volume and Tone for both pickups but wanted to be able to have a little bit of a mixing capability as well as having the effect of having one or the other pickup on. Thus I have the B/V/T harness (with coil tapping pull/push on the V/T knobs for each pickup). I love the effect ... it serves me well.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4454
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by woodyng »

I've had several of my 4004 basses converted to VVT,but decided to try a MV/pan/MT setup on my Cheyennne 1.
I really can't say there's much difference in the available sounds with either setup. Having the Pan pot does keep you from having to decide which volume control to alter.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by jps »

woodyng wrote:...Having the Pan pot does keep you from having to decide which volume control to alter.
First world problems. :lol:
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4454
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by woodyng »

jps wrote:
woodyng wrote:...Having the Pan pot does keep you from having to decide which volume control to alter.
First world problems. :lol:
Right? :lol: 8)
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3731
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by ram »

I have read threads where the blend is supposed to alter the sound or tone... I have not noticed this. I am actually toying with the idea of getting a harness for either my 4003s5 or 4001 with a blend and overall volume. Keeping the two tone pots.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
Gilmourisgod
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:26 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by Gilmourisgod »

I've always preferred a Master Volume, Blend, and Treble/Bass knobs. With two volumes, any time you adjust volume, you also adjust tone a bit by default because you are adjusting blend too. Is there any way to wire a stock Rick 4003 for that configuration? Any ideas how to use the pup switch in the that scenario? I suppose it could be a dummy or maybe a kill switch?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by jps »

Gilmourisgod wrote:I've always preferred a Master Volume, Blend, and Treble/Bass knobs. With two volumes, any time you adjust volume, you also adjust tone a bit by default because you are adjusting blend too. Is there any way to wire a stock Rick 4003 for that configuration? Any ideas how to use the pup switch in the that scenario? I suppose it could be a dummy or maybe a kill switch?
You could run the pickups to the switch then to the blend control, and on to the master volume control. The selector switch on a 4001/2/3/5 are "stereo" capable so that makes it easy to go from it to the blend control. Then you could choose to blend the pickups as desired and still have the ability to quickly switch between pickups.
Gilmourisgod
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:26 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by Gilmourisgod »

jps wrote:You could run the pickups to the switch then to the blend control, and on to the master volume control. The selector switch on a 4001/2/3/5 are "stereo" capable so that makes it easy to go from it to the blend control. Then you could choose to blend the pickups as desired and still have the ability to quickly switch between pickups.
JPS
Thanks for the description. Unfortunately, I am an idiot when it comes to wiring without a stupid-simple diagram. My soldering skills are pretty good, but I can't read schemmatics. Has anybody done this mod, or seen a simple graphic wiring diagram illustrating the connections?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by jps »

Sorry, I have no wiring diagrams for this, perhaps someone with the graphics skills to do so with a computer program can make one for you. Essentially, you're just adding a pan pot (dual potentiometer, ganged to one shaft, like a balance control on a stereo system) between the selector switch and the volume/tone controls on a standard Rick harness. A real blend pot, as used in musical instruments, are wired for a mono output from two inputs, IIRC.
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by iiipopes »

On a passive pan setup you will lose volume in the middle detent with both pickups full on from the impedance drop. A buffered active setup, like the EMG ABC or ABCX is designed to keep this from happening.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: To Pan or Blend

Post by jps »

iiipopes wrote:On a passive pan setup you will lose volume in the middle detent with both pickups full on from the impedance drop. A buffered active setup, like the EMG ABC or ABCX is designed to keep this from happening.
Hence, the reason a passive VVT harness is superior on a passive instrument. :mrgreen:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”