Normal for a new Ric?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

maxwell
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by maxwell »

^ ^ ^ :lol: You got me good with that one!
User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1562
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by squirebass »

This thread has grown entirely too silly!
Attachments
Silly2.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by jps »

squirebass wrote:This thread has grown entirely too silly!
No, it hasn't! :mrgreen:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNkjDuSVXiE
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by lumgimfong »

IMG_8921 (1).JPG
Here is my 2016 4003 truss rod cavily. Long slots and no dot. 16th week of 2016, I think. SN starts with 1616
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by jps »

Chromes?
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by lumgimfong »

Yes.
.104 Chromes on Hipshot Ultralite tuners.
maxwell
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by maxwell »

Your's is not a Mapleglo. The dot has been "painted" over. :)
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by lumgimfong »

Paint is translucent and you can see through it there. Even an inspection with flashlight reveals no dot.
Maybe it washed out in the paint. I wonder what they are for. Maybe just a "done" indicator for the next fella down the assembly line?
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by lumgimfong »

oops... I meant .100 chromes set.
maxwell
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by maxwell »

lumgimfong wrote:Paint is translucent and you can see through it there. Even an inspection with flashlight reveals no dot.
Maybe it washed out in the paint. I wonder what they are for. Maybe just a "done" indicator for the next fella down the assembly line?
No one really has a clue about "the dot." Just fooling around; fun. Unless Mr. Hall chimes in, we'll probably never know. And if Mr. Hall did tell us something that could be even remotely understood, or worse, misunderstood about the dot during manufacture, there could a landslide of "worried" Rick owners bugging RIC HQ.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6231
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by cheyenne »

Here, I'll put a blue dot on mine. :mrgreen:
blue dot II.jpg
"Knowledge is Power"
JMDunn
New member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:51 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by JMDunn »

Should we start a new thread about the dot?

I am wondering why no one from the company has cleared this up yet.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6231
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by cheyenne »

I really think its just an inspection mark.
"Knowledge is Power"
maxwell
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:14 pm

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by maxwell »

^ ^ ^ That could be it -- makes a lot of sense.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Normal for a new Ric?

Post by jps »

cheyenne wrote:Here, I'll put a blue dot on mine. :mrgreen:
blue dot II.jpg
That's the spirit!!! :mrgreen:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”