W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2902
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by ilan »

Wildwood are specifying weight of basses in stock and I have just noticed that the new 4003SW's are about 1.5lbs lighter than maple-bodied 4003's. The lightest one they have is only 8.01lbs, compared to 9.24 to 9.84lbs maple 4003's.

It makes sense, but I never thought the difference will be so significant.

https://wildwoodguitars.com/?s=4003
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by henry5 »

I find it interesting that both my '72 4001 basses are, at least so far as I can tell, no more than 8 and a half pounds. They're probably the lightest 4001 basses I've played. A while back I played a friend's relatively new 4003 and it was much heavier than my basses, I would have said easily a pound, maybe a pound and a half (I have chronic back, neck and shoulders problems so it really makes a difference). Sounds like the walnut basses will be an easier wear in that respect. I've only played one, at the same time as playing the above 4003, and it was about the same weight as my basses.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4702
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by cassius987 »

Yep, I have consistently noted about a pound less weight on the W models. May be total coincidence, but I always tend to think lighter weight basses have a more "open" sound.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by henry5 »

cassius987 wrote:Yep, I have consistently noted about a pound less weight on the W models. May be total coincidence, but I always tend to think lighter weight basses have a more "open" sound.
I agree wholeheartedly, certainly in my experience.
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by lumgimfong »

My modded 2016 4003 is 8.8lbs
User avatar
weemac
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2735
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 1:28 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by weemac »

I imagine that if you want to best recreate the RM1999 sound with a modern bass the best starting point would be a 4003sw
I would if I could...
I confused Faraday's cage, with Schrodinger's cat box....
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by jdogric12 »

I played an SW once at POTR and it was super light. I just got a 72 4001 and it's very light as well!
User avatar
songdog
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:04 pm

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by songdog »

jdogric12 wrote:I just got a 72 4001 and it's very light as well!
Curious... I have a '72 4001 (LKxxxx, November 1972), and it's actually pretty heavy, 9.8 lbs. on the postal scale at work. Part of that is the reissue horseshoe, but I think even before that it was about 9.2 lbs., not what I'd consider "very light."

I'll say this, though: something about the bass makes it feel much lighter than my F*****r Jazz which is 10.0 lbs. Maybe it's just the psychological effect of looking down and seeing that thinner body? :lol:

What month is your '72? Does it have the skunk stripe? IIRC, that was an early '72 change, I wonder if something affected the weight in conjunction with it?

Do you know what the actual weight is?
Turn on, tune up, rock out!
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by jdogric12 »

songdog wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:I just got a 72 4001 and it's very light as well!
Curious... I have a '72 4001 (LKxxxx, November 1972), and it's actually pretty heavy, 9.8 lbs. on the postal scale at work. Part of that is the reissue horseshoe, but I think even before that it was about 9.2 lbs., not what I'd consider "very light."

I'll say this, though: something about the bass makes it feel much lighter than my F*****r Jazz which is 10.0 lbs. Maybe it's just the psychological effect of looking down and seeing that thinner body? :lol:

What month is your '72? Does it have the skunk stripe? IIRC, that was an early '72 change, I wonder if something affected the weight in conjunction with it?

Do you know what the actual weight is?
Sept, skunk. It may very well be the pyschological thing! I'll try to remember to weigh it when I can.
User avatar
Koshchei
New member
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by Koshchei »

I can confirm that my 4003sw is about a pound lighter than its maple-winged cousins.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: W/SW 1.5lbs lighter?

Post by henry5 »

songdog wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:I just got a 72 4001 and it's very light as well!
Curious... I have a '72 4001 (LKxxxx, November 1972), and it's actually pretty heavy, 9.8 lbs. on the postal scale at work. Part of that is the reissue horseshoe, but I think even before that it was about 9.2 lbs., not what I'd consider "very light."

I'll say this, though: something about the bass makes it feel much lighter than my F*****r Jazz which is 10.0 lbs. Maybe it's just the psychological effect of looking down and seeing that thinner body? :lol:

What month is your '72? Does it have the skunk stripe? IIRC, that was an early '72 change, I wonder if something affected the weight in conjunction with it?

Do you know what the actual weight is?
Both my Rics are '72s, a pre-skunk Feb and a skunk Aug. They're both the same weight, give or take. I've played lots of '72s - my favourite year - and I've only played one that was noticeably heavier than mine. That was Neil Brewer's bass, from Druid. The skunk itself doesn't seem to make much difference. It's quite possible that yours is on the heavier side, but generally IME they tend to be relatively light, as Rics go. Of course we're only talking maybe half a pound to a pound absolute max, but as I have chronic back problems I really notice the difference.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”