Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Curtron
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:35 pm

Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by Curtron »

I've had an '83 4001 for about 6 months now and I absolutely love it, couldn't be happier. My only concern is that it's got the wavy Grovers, they are functioning just fine currently although one looks slightly tampered with.
I've read all of the exploding nightmare stories and I've decided if they do eventually blow, repairing or sourcing another vintage set is way out of my skill level, budget, and patience thresh hold.
Are there any tuners easily available that fit in without any extra routing? Do the other 4001 open backed tuners fit in? If no to all this then what's the closest fit with minimal damage?
Thank you Rick hive mind!
User avatar
sfuentes
New member
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 1:40 pm

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by sfuentes »

The Kluson tuners with black ferrules should fit just the post holes fine, although you will need to drill new screw holes into the headstock.
Attachments
Kluson Tuners.JPG
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by FretlessOnly »

I have December '72 and April '73 4001 basses with original wavy Grovers and no problems. Yes, they can fail, but I get the sense that the rather extreme nature of the failure brings this issue to the fore more than its frequency of occurrence would dictate.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by jps »

FretlessOnly wrote:I have December '72 and April '73 4001 basses with original wavy Grovers and no problems. Yes, they can fail, but I get the sense that the rather extreme nature of the failure brings this issue to the fore more than its frequency of occurrence would dictate.
...and when there is a failure, the fix is rather simple, for those mechanically inclined. If not, there are folks out there that can do the remedy, easily.

Besides that, it appears your are working okay, so you shouldn't, unnecessarily, worry about it until it really does become an issue.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by henry5 »

jps wrote:
FretlessOnly wrote:I have December '72 and April '73 4001 basses with original wavy Grovers and no problems. Yes, they can fail, but I get the sense that the rather extreme nature of the failure brings this issue to the fore more than its frequency of occurrence would dictate.
...and when there is a failure, the fix is rather simple, for those mechanically inclined. If not, there are folks out there that can do the remedy, easily.

Besides that, it appears your are working okay, so you shouldn't, unnecessarily, worry about it until it really does become an issue.
I've actually lucked into bumping into someone I know who is a welder (and thus mechanically inclined) who has offered to fix them for me, but prior to that had drawn a blank in the UK, hence why I had been planning to send them across the pond to Larry. My most recent set - those that failed - have been swaged within an inch of their lives so are going to need the invasive screw treatment. It's a job I originally couldn't find anyone, anywhere nearby to take on.

Also, having had the first fail, I've realised that if one goes prior to a gig or, heaven forbid, in the middle of one, if you haven't got a spare bass (or a spare working tuner to hand) you really are screwed. I don't tend to take a spare bass to gigs and I can only count my blessings that it's not happened at a gig. As a result I've checked my other basses and 2 of the tuners on my main bass are ready to go, so I'm hopefully going to get my friend to do all of the tuners on all my basses. Failing that, I may bite the bullet and get a drill press (I've bought everything else required) and attempt them myself, although though having no metalworking experience at all I'm a little reluctant to take that path.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by jps »

Yeah, I too, wouldn't try my hand at drilling/tapping the screw holes, as the walls are pretty thin (to us neophytes, anyway). Surely, the fine folks at the Jaguar factory could help you with this, right? :mrgreen:
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by aceonbass »

sfuentes wrote:The Kluson tuners with black ferrules should fit just the post holes fine, although you will need to drill new screw holes into the headstock.
Kluson tuners are not direct replacements for Grover tuners. In fact part of the A tuner will hang over the edge of the headstock, and be exposed from the front.
User avatar
sfuentes
New member
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu May 17, 2018 1:40 pm

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by sfuentes »

aceonbass wrote: Kluson tuners are not direct replacements for Grover tuners. In fact part of the A tuner will hang over the edge of the headstock, and be exposed from the front.
Nope.
F2DBC03B-F198-460F-8E10-14C405EF2700.jpeg
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by aceonbass »

What year is that bass? I've seen attempts made to put Klusons on early 70's 4001's, but Grovers were slso used on early 80's 4001/3's, which may have had a different layout.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by jps »

Depending on the year, the A tuning key was up high on the headstock, closer to the cresting wave, or lower down, in line with the D tuning key, so that is probably the difference.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by henry5 »

jps wrote:Yeah, I too, wouldn't try my hand at drilling/tapping the screw holes, as the walls are pretty thin (to us neophytes, anyway). Surely, the fine folks at the Jaguar factory could help you with this, right? :mrgreen:
I'll get them to fix 'em while they're polishing my D-type. :lol:

Yeah, the (tiny) size of the task is a worry, to the inexperienced.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by henry5 »

jps wrote:Depending on the year, the A tuning key was up high on the headstock, closer to the cresting wave, or lower down, in line with the D tuning key, so that is probably the difference.
I briefly had a '73 that someone had fitted Klusons to and there was definitely overhang, although I can't remember which tuner.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by jps »

henry5 wrote:I'll get them to fix 'em while they're polishing my D-type. :lol:
Hmm, now I have to wonder about you. :shock:

You seemed more the XK120 type. :mrgreen:
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by henry5 »

jps wrote:
henry5 wrote:I'll get them to fix 'em while they're polishing my D-type. :lol:
Hmm, now I have to wonder about you. :shock:

You seemed more the XK120 type. :mrgreen:
Funny you should say that. just got mine out of storage:
s-l640.jpg
:lol:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Replacements, not repair, for wavy Grovers?

Post by jps »

:lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”