Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
scoobster28
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 697
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm

Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by scoobster28 »

For all the time I have spent on the guitar forums over the past 20 years, I know very little about Rickenbacker basses. Someday I will buy "the book." But, until then, can someone explain to me what the deal is with the dot and triangle inlays. I thought that as a general rule all 4001 basses had dot inlays, and all 4003 basses had triangle inlays (sometimes full width, sometimes not). However, I have seen 4003s basses online with dot inlays, and 4001 basses with triangle inlays.

Perhaps some are mislabeled online. But, can someone explain to rational (or at least the pattern) for which basses received which?

Thanks.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by aceonbass »

Model 3000, 3001, 4001S, 4003S, 4002, and RM1999 basses had dots.
User avatar
scoobster28
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 697
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by scoobster28 »

Thanks!
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2707
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by henry5 »

Like Dane says.

Basically, as far as the 4001 & 4003 go, “s” suffix basses have no binding and dot markers. The normal 4001 and 4003 are “deluxe” models, i.e. they have binding and triangle markers. The 4003 replaced the 4001, for what it’s worth.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by jdogric12 »

The 4000 had dots too. (Exception: the 2015 4000 FB)
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6553
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by bassduke49 »

And all of the 2000 series basses had dots, too. You really need the book. I put it together as more of a "field guide" pointing out the various detail differences among the 40 or so distinct Rickenbacker bass models.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Guzzitd63
New member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:23 pm

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by Guzzitd63 »

jdogric12 wrote:... the 2015 4000 FB
What does this presumably rare animal look like?
Does anyone have a pic?
I've not heard of it.
User avatar
bigbajo60
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 910
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:15 pm

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by bigbajo60 »

:mrgreen: :wink:
Attachments
index.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by jps »

Guzzitd63 wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:... the 2015 4000 FB
What does this presumably rare animal look like?
Does anyone have a pic?
I've not heard of it.
I'm trying to figure that one out, also (or, my brain is just too fried, most likely). Maybe, it's a one-off FaceBook model. :mrgreen: Or, perhaps, a custom for Frank Bello. :mrgreen:
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6553
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by bassduke49 »

jps wrote:
Guzzitd63 wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:... the 2015 4000 FB
What does this presumably rare animal look like?
Does anyone have a pic?
I've not heard of it.
I'm trying to figure that one out, also (or, my brain is just too fried, most likely). Maybe, it's a one-off FaceBook model. :mrgreen: Or, perhaps, a custom for Frank Bello. :mrgreen:
P. 153 of the second edition. 8)
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Guzzitd63
New member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2018 7:23 pm

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by Guzzitd63 »

bassduke49 wrote:
P. 153 of the second edition. 8)
Dang Paul. Now I gotta go find my book.
(Its still packed away after my move in late summer.)
And ... thank you! :)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by jps »

bassduke49 wrote:
P. 153 of the second edition. 8)
I'll go look, the book is right next to my collection of American Bungalow magazines. Good company. :D
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by jdogric12 »

FB stands for flat black. You can see it announced on RIC's official facebook page some time in 2017, IIRC, though it was made two years earlier. It was a one off, but not publicly for sale. It is kind if a pre-Noir, with a rosewood fretboard with triangle inlays.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6553
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by bassduke49 »

Good to see you name again, JDog! Hope all is well! :D
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: Neck inlays: dot versus triangles

Post by FretlessOnly »

The 4001FL and 4003FL models also have board dots. It's not clear why, as the board dots are of little practical use since they are in the same locations as on fretted versions. FLs would look great with the shark inlays. Of course, the shark inlays would be of little practical use as well, but they'd look great. 8)
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”