1972 4001s project advice

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

Hi,
I just became the happy owner of a 1972 Rickenbacker 4001S, Jetglow, black bridge and pickup ring, white scratchplate.
I wanted a rick since I first saw one some 30 years ago.

This one was cheap but needs quite some work:
Scratchplate is broken. saddles are missing, Grover tuners have been replaced witch Schallers.
Although the schaller tuners work great they look really bad.

I want to restore it as good as possible without breaking the bank.
Original 70's parts are above my budget

Searching for parts I am looking for some advice:
What is your opinion on the Hipshot HB5 tuners and on the Allparts Rickenbacker bridge

Pictures will follow soon :-)

Thanx in advance
anoukane
Intermediate Member
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 6:07 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by anoukane »

Nice one. Saw it for sale too.
Looked like it had a bad refin as well.

Don’t have experience with the parts your mentioning.
Good luck with the project!
User avatar
Dirk
Member
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:06 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by Dirk »

Pickguard is the easy part, contact Pickguardian. Tony made me a nice custom 2 piece replacement for my '81 4003.
https://www.pickguardian.com/

You should be able to find the bridge saddles?
http://boutique.rickenbacker.com/SADDLE ... p_538.html
I think more folks seem to like the Hipshot bridge if you are replacing it completely.

Tuners I would guess the Hipshot might be the best, but I've had no personal experience.

Have fun getting it back in shape.

Good luck,
Dirk
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by jps »

Another option for a total replacement of the bridge/tailpiece is the new V2 assembly from RIC.

http://boutique.rickenbacker.com/4003v2 ... p_786.html
teptwizz02
New member
Posts: 23
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by teptwizz02 »

I have the hipshot HB5's on my 4003 in black and they look fantastic and function perfectly. I needed to specify that I wanted the "short pegs", although that might be standard now. I would also ask if you can get both sizes of bushing as it may be difficult to be 100% certain they’ll fit properly in your headstock. Here's some pics of mine.
BC76F341-868A-4303-A6F1-94046B776929.jpeg
9F5A6562-3084-4D48-9CE4-F1482AA1D240.jpeg
BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

Here is what it looks like now.
Apart from the bridge saddle and tuners everything appears to be original. No one has soldered in it. Pots are from '72 and still working :-)
I ordered tuners today.
Attachments
thumbnail_IMG_20200709_172942.jpg
thumbnail_IMG_20200709_172936.jpg
User avatar
Badanovski
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:19 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by Badanovski »

The all parts bridge has the rattling saddle problem that the Rickenbacker bridges had at one time. They picked the wrong bridge to copy. lol
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6553
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by bassduke49 »

FYI, the "black" tailpiece and treble pickup cover are either replacements or refinished originals. Rickenbacker started doing blackened metal parts in 1985.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

Thanks for the info.
I glued the scratch plate this afternoon.
A big piece is missing but now it plays.
Pickups are out of phase.
That is weird.
With the bass cut cap bridges the pickups cancel each other out.
With the cap in the system it works though.
The bridge has a tooth gap and just 3 screws.
I found this nice read:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=388381
So it is probabely a refin.
I'll check it today :-)
BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

Here are pictures ofthe bridge.
It looks like a solid cast aluminim bridge, identical to the 60's and early 70's bridges but it is black.
Doesn't loo like it is hand painted.
Can't it be a limited run or a one-off bridge in this colour?

Under the bridge a patch of clearcoated wood is visible with handwritten 4000G underneath the clearcoat.
The marking have been masked during the black coating.
I think this indicates a refin, doens't it?
Attachments
brug onderk.jpg
BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

The bridge seriously seems to be powdercoated.
The powdercoating pocess has been invented in the 40's so it should be possible this was done in '72.
I tried removing the black colour with acetone on the bottom of the bridge but the coat is hard as rock and not the slightest bit will dissolve.


Does this look like a refin? :? I am afraid so but would like confirmation.

If so should I sand it down and make it mapleglow again?
Clearcoat, waterproof sanding and polishing isn't too difficult. Just takes time.

Even easier is a high grade wood oil and machine polish, and a finish with polished wax. Gives a fantastic feel for the neck.....

This his bass is so old I may consider selling it or trade it for a newer more modern Rickenbacker.

Although I love the look and the idea of the history of vintage instruments I always seem to like modern sound.
Attachments
onder de brug verkleind.jpg
brug verkleind.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by jps »

I've never seen a black (however it was coated) aluminum tailpiece. Never say never, but this had to have been done after the fact. Same with the rest of the hardware; as Paul note above, Rickenbacker did not offer black hardware during that timeframe.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37141
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by jps »

Oh, yeah. What's with those three extra holes in the tailpiece route?
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by thx1955 »

jps wrote:Another option for a total replacement of the bridge/tailpiece is the new V2 assembly from RIC.

http://boutique.rickenbacker.com/4003v2 ... p_786.html
Congratulations on the find, and your first Rickenbacker.

+1 on that, the new bridge is great.

Additionaly you could replace the tuners with new "open back" tuning machines, again available from Rickenbacker.
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
BQmusic
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 2:15 pm

Re: 1972 4001s project advice

Post by BQmusic »

Two of the 3 extra holes in the bridge route are for the threaded studs that hold the homemade saddle assembly up.
The other hole is a mystery. I'll make a photo of the saddle later. It'll be a good laugh.

Still don't know what to do with the finish.

The bridge will stay black... can't take the finish off.

Maybe I'll sand it and turn it into a mapleglow with black scratchplate and black hardware.

Or I'll just keep it like this and turn it in a nice road worn player.

The neck is good and straight and the acion is low. I'll rock it in the band as soon as I have decent saddle assembly and the intonation is better :-)

I'll be back here when the bass is ready.

Thanks everybody!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”