Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by jdogric12 »

So I've really taken to the .040 G string on one of my Yamaha basses. Super light and fun. That's a little something I got from Lee Sklar. I wonder what it would be like on a Rick?
User avatar
Dirk
Member
Posts: 339
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:06 pm

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by Dirk »

What's stopping you? It's not that big of a change actually.

Have fun, and Lee rocks!
Dirk
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37140
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by jps »

jdogric12 wrote:So I've really taken to the .040 G string on one of my Yamaha basses. Super light and fun. That's a little something I got from Lee Sklar. I wonder what it would be like on a Rick?
I've been using 40-X gauge strings on my Rick basses for decades, and all other basses, too. Go for it.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3731
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by ram »

I use D'Adderio EXL220-5 on my 4003-5 (125/95/75/65/40). I also run the EXL220's on my eight stringt fundamental strings. Love the string weight. Also run ECB84's (flat wounds) on my 4001. Go for it!!!
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by thx1955 »

jdogric12 wrote:So I've really taken to the .040 G string on one of my Yamaha basses. Super light and fun. That's a little something I got from Lee Sklar. I wonder what it would be like on a Rick?
Like Jeffery and the others been using .40g for years, both D'Adderio and Ernie Ball, 40-65-80-100 and also 40-60-80-95, lighter gauge is (IMHO) part of the success with neck stability over the years
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by scott_s »

After reading a bunch of old threads, I recently restrung my bass (sadly not a Rick) 40-55-75-100. Finally, the string tension is balanced and the truss rod doesn’t have to work as hard as it did with 45-65-80-100. Doesn’t seem to have hurt the sound, either!
User avatar
Isaac
Member
Posts: 439
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:24 am

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by Isaac »

scott_s wrote:After reading a bunch of old threads, I recently restrung my bass (sadly not a Rick) 40-55-75-100. Finally, the string tension is balanced and the truss rod doesn’t have to work as hard as it did with 45-65-80-100. Doesn’t seem to have hurt the sound, either!
What kind of strings?
prowla
Junior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 3:35 am

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by prowla »

I use Rotosound 40-60-80-100 on mine.
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by scott_s »

Isaac wrote:
scott_s wrote:After reading a bunch of old threads, I recently restrung my bass (sadly not a Rick) 40-55-75-100. Finally, the string tension is balanced and the truss rod doesn’t have to work as hard as it did with 45-65-80-100. Doesn’t seem to have hurt the sound, either!
What kind of strings?
D’Addario Chromes.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13099
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Considering putting a .040 on a Rick (G)

Post by rickenbrother »

scott_s wrote:
Isaac wrote:
scott_s wrote:After reading a bunch of old threads, I recently restrung my bass (sadly not a Rick) 40-55-75-100. Finally, the string tension is balanced and the truss rod doesn’t have to work as hard as it did with 45-65-80-100. Doesn’t seem to have hurt the sound, either!
What kind of strings?
D’Addario Chromes.
I like The D'Addario Chromes ECB84 set on basses on which I use flatwound strings. In my opinion it's the most balanced Chromes set. The string gauges are: .100 - .080 - .060 - .040. You just have to break then in a bit, because they have bit of a bright roundwound string zing to them when you first put them on.

If you really need old school Jamerson-like thump right out of the package, the La Bella Low Tension Flats are the way to go. The gauges are: .100 - .070 - .056 - .042. They really don't that low of a tension, not like the TI JF-344 set, just lower than most sets of flatwound strings, definitely moire tension than TI's, I'd say about the same as a set of D'Addario XL-170's, which are my usual go-to set for roundwound strings. I'd say the D'Addario ECB84 set might have slightly more tension than the La Bella LTF set.
The JETGLO finish name should be officially changed to JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”