To sum It up?

Exploring the beauty and tone of Rickenbacker Lap Steels

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
mp_me
Junior Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:35 pm

To sum It up?

Post by mp_me »

I'm thinking of buying a Bakelite lap steel.
I've looked around at this forum and come to a few conclusions:

1- A 1.5" Magnet is better
2- An integrated Bakelite bridge, where the strings go thru the body has more sustain, and is therefore better.
3- Pre-war steels are better than post.

Is this correct?
Also I have not read much on nameplates...
Can one tell anything about the steel by the name plate?
i.e. "Rickenbacher Electro" (T-shaped), "Rickenbacher" (vertical), "Rickenbacher Electro L.A. Calif..." (horizontal)
rshatz
RRF Consultant
Posts: 466
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2000 11:31 am

Post by rshatz »

Mark,
I'm going to try to answer by the numbers.
1. Most people think so. They're all good depending on the sound you're looking for.
2. Most people would agree. Sometimes I don't want much sustain at all, but I'm more a blues guy than a country guy. Some of the ones with the metal tail pieces also sustain incredibly.
3. I can't say that's really true. Again, it depends on the sound you're looking for.

Headstock logos are well documented, but not always completely accurate for dating an instrument.
PreWW2: Engraved "Electro"
Metal "Electro" name plate
PostWW2: Decal Rickenbacher
T shaped logo
Blade shaped logo
Hope this helps. Almost all of them are really good.
User avatar
mp_me
Junior Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 5:35 pm

Post by mp_me »

That helps a great deal.
Thanks!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Steels: by Richard Shatz”