Modifying my new 320
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:13 am
- Contact:
Modifying my new 320
Hi, I recieved a '91 320 JG this week and I have got a few questions:
I'd like to install a vibrato-tailpiece, but which one? Bigsby or Ac'cent? (I'll use it the 'Lennon'-way, i.e. not, just for look)
Will it fit into it's case anymore when having installed a vibrato?
Now the Pickups: A the moment it has Hi-Gains and I have already modified the 5th knob wireing. Installing Toasters and /or adding a HB in neck position? BTW, how do the HBs sound on a Rick?
Lot's of question and I hope to get some replies!
Here's the photo:
Flo
I'd like to install a vibrato-tailpiece, but which one? Bigsby or Ac'cent? (I'll use it the 'Lennon'-way, i.e. not, just for look)
Will it fit into it's case anymore when having installed a vibrato?
Now the Pickups: A the moment it has Hi-Gains and I have already modified the 5th knob wireing. Installing Toasters and /or adding a HB in neck position? BTW, how do the HBs sound on a Rick?
Lot's of question and I hope to get some replies!
Here's the photo:
Flo
I haven't yet heard the hb p/u,as for the tremelo I waould go with the accent for two reasons:It is correct for that model if you want the lennon look and if you want to sell it you will not have to worry about holes in the front of the body de-valuing(spelled wrong?) your guitar.I am always reluctant to drill holes in the face of ricks,but thats just me.You can install accents without re-drilling the strap holes.It works fine.
Rick Lover: To me this guitar is screaming out for toasters. If you want the Lennon-look of his second guitar, then the Ac'cent is the way to go. The humbucker in the bridge would be whisper quite but you will notice that the other two pickups will sound noisy in comparison. The humbucker will not give you the jangle of the toaster.
Should you want the look of Lennon's first instrument just after it was sprayed black then the Bigsby would be the way to go. The Bigsby takes some getting used to compared to the clean lines of this 320. You would also need to add a gold guard and nameplate.
A third option would be to replace the "R" tailpiece with a trapeze and add a gold guard and nameplate. I confess, however, that the black and white contrasting features of this guitar are hard to beat.
I am partial to the trapeze tailpiece as it takes us back to the early days of Rickenbacker. Changing the tailpiece is not reversible without seeing drill holes. Going from the R to the trapeze, however, the bracket does cover up the old drill holes.
Should you want the look of Lennon's first instrument just after it was sprayed black then the Bigsby would be the way to go. The Bigsby takes some getting used to compared to the clean lines of this 320. You would also need to add a gold guard and nameplate.
A third option would be to replace the "R" tailpiece with a trapeze and add a gold guard and nameplate. I confess, however, that the black and white contrasting features of this guitar are hard to beat.
I am partial to the trapeze tailpiece as it takes us back to the early days of Rickenbacker. Changing the tailpiece is not reversible without seeing drill holes. Going from the R to the trapeze, however, the bracket does cover up the old drill holes.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Peter,
Wouldn't it be possible to transfer the hole pattern from the "R" tailpiece to the lower bracket of the trapeze, and not have to drill the guitar? I realise that there would be a couple of unused holes in the tailpiece, but I believe that the mounting integrity of the trapeze would be fine and it would preserve the instrument.
Wouldn't it be possible to transfer the hole pattern from the "R" tailpiece to the lower bracket of the trapeze, and not have to drill the guitar? I realise that there would be a couple of unused holes in the tailpiece, but I believe that the mounting integrity of the trapeze would be fine and it would preserve the instrument.
I've just modified my 1981 320 with the addition of a Bigsby B5. Ordered it from www.elderly.com and when it turned up yesterday, I took a big deep breath and......
It needs Toasters to complete the look as the Hi-gains just don't look right but they will have to wait until funds permit. Not restrung at the time of the photo. See what you think.
It needs Toasters to complete the look as the Hi-gains just don't look right but they will have to wait until funds permit. Not restrung at the time of the photo. See what you think.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5285
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 1:15 pm
- Contact:
-
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:13 am
- Contact:
Now, nearly two years, after I opened this thread I want to tell you, that I finished the modifying on my guitar (actually since april).
I made a 320v64 out of it, with toasters, a trapeze tailpiece and vintage style knobs.
As I mentioned earlier, I rewired the fith knob as a volumecontrol for the middle pickup and I am quite satisfied with these modifications, although I mostly leave the middlepickup turned off.
As I am from Germany, I have no problems to get Pyramid flats 12s for my 320, but I still do not know whether to use a plain or wound third string. Waht are your comments?
Since about half a year this 320 has put my 330 Red BT on the second place of my favourite guitars.
Flo
PS: I will post a photo of my 320 tonight.
I made a 320v64 out of it, with toasters, a trapeze tailpiece and vintage style knobs.
As I mentioned earlier, I rewired the fith knob as a volumecontrol for the middle pickup and I am quite satisfied with these modifications, although I mostly leave the middlepickup turned off.
As I am from Germany, I have no problems to get Pyramid flats 12s for my 320, but I still do not know whether to use a plain or wound third string. Waht are your comments?
Since about half a year this 320 has put my 330 Red BT on the second place of my favourite guitars.
Flo
PS: I will post a photo of my 320 tonight.
I can hardly wait to see this photo Florian. If you are not playing lead with your 320 I would go with the wound G string. It is a much fuller sound and enriches the tonality, at least in my view. Should you be a string bender, then the plain G would be my choice.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
-
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:13 am
- Contact: