Crazy to get 325c64?

The short-scale model that changed history

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

ces1965
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:04 pm

Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by ces1965 »

As my first Ric? Hi I'm a new member.

I know about the small scale but it appeals to me because it will be different, and I play a lot of rhythm. I'm in the mood for early Beatles having seen some Beatles cover bands over labor day weekend in DC.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by JakeK »

Early 1962-1965 Beatles rhythms...there's only one guitar for that: a 325. Go. For. It.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by collin »

JakeK wrote:Early 1962-1965 Beatles rhythms...there's only one guitar for that: a 325. Go. For. It.
I. Disagree.


There is no discernible difference in tone (to my ears) if early Beatles are played on any vintage spec reissue Rickenbacker.

I would highly suggest finding a 325 in person first and see how it "fits" you, as they are very cool, very uncomfortable guitars for many people. After all, this is why the 350 model was invented.
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7094
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by scotty »

I think thats right try and see how it feels and sounds before you buy.Too small for me im afraid...
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by rickinroma »

a 350 should be the right compromise between playability and look
too bad it does not feature an Accent vibrato or the R tailpiece instead of that trapezoidal thing
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by k43rover »

collin wrote:
JakeK wrote:Early 1962-1965 Beatles rhythms...there's only one guitar for that: a 325. Go. For. It.
I. Disagree.


There is no discernible difference in tone (to my ears) if early Beatles are played on any vintage spec reissue Rickenbacker.

...mmmm...unusually Collin, I am going to have to agree to disagree with you on this one :shock: I bought a 320 earlier in the year and respec'd it to a 325. I gotta say to my ears, playing through an all handwired AC30, I felt it more accurately replicated the early Beatles Lennon rhythm tones than any of my other full scale '60's Ricks (or vintage reissues come to that). Now maybe its just self trickery of the ears as a result of some sort of psychological delusions of (Lennon) grandeur when you are thrashing a 3/4 scale Rick, but I definitely felt there was a discernible difference in tone....

Having said all that, I too didn't get along with the short scale at all and I decided to sell it very quickly.

If possible Cliff, I would strongly recommend trying out a 320/325 before purchase as I suspect most of us here while loving the look of them have ended up with 330/360 series guitars as our favourites... Personally I wouldn't go for a 350 at all as they just look unbalanced to my eye..
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by collin »

k43rover wrote: Now maybe its just self trickery of the ears as a result of some sort of psychological delusions of (Lennon) grandeur when you are thrashing a 3/4 scale Rick, but I definitely felt there was a discernible difference in tone....
Nope....just psychological delusions of Lennon grandeur. :lol:

Maybe it's not identical tone, but probably close enough for government work, and I think many people don't play Lennon's parts properly enough for a true comparison. The guy definitely liked some strange chord shapes. :shock:

We'll have to agree to disagree then!
k43rover wrote:
If possible Cliff, I would strongly recommend trying out a 320/325 before purchase as I suspect most of us here while loving the look of them have ended up with 330/360 series guitars as our favourites... Personally I wouldn't go for a 350 at all as they just look unbalanced to my eye..
Definitely agree with ya there on the 350...not my cuppa at all. :wink:
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by k43rover »

collin wrote: Nope....just psychological delusions of Lennon grandeur. :lol:

...you're probably right Collin...it's just like whenever I get my 1998 out, I have to slip into my Union Flag jacket and I am totally convinced I sound just like Pete...(yeah right :roll: as dogs bark and babies howl all along the street...) :lol:
ces1965
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:04 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by ces1965 »

Thanks for the advice. I did just find a store that has a 325c64 about an hour from me, which I was not expecting. Hopefully they will have some others like a 330 or 360 I can try at the same time.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by collin »

ces1965 wrote:Thanks for the advice. I did just find a store that has a 325c64 about an hour from me, which I was not expecting. Hopefully they will have some others like a 330 or 360 I can try at the same time.

Excellent, try it out !

I will say this much --- while many people (myself included) have griped about the difficult playing of the 325 models....I have yet to run into a single person who said the reverse, meaning that if you find the 325 cramped at all--->buy a 330 or 360! :)
ninevolt
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:06 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by ninevolt »

The issue of 'uncomfortable' guitars is always interesting to me. It's a fine line between looks and comfort for designers and I think that sometimes, especially in the world of rics it's almost worth growing to love something that is perhaps not 'moulded to the contours of your body'
ces1965
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:04 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by ces1965 »

So I tried it out today. I didn't find it uncomfortable, just different. Some things are easier to play, some things are harder. I've never been that sensitive to changes in neck length or size, as I'll go from playing my precision bass with a huge neck to my guitars, most of which have smaller necks.

So I liked the 325 a lot. I think I'm going to buy, it was really cool! It had a lot of different sounds and seemed very nicely made.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by k43rover »

ces1965 wrote:So I tried it out today. I didn't find it uncomfortable, just different. Some things are easier to play, some things are harder. I've never been that sensitive to changes in neck length or size, as I'll go from playing my precision bass with a huge neck to my guitars, most of which have smaller necks.

So I liked the 325 a lot. I think I'm going to buy, it was really cool! It had a lot of different sounds and seemed very nicely made.

...good for you Cliff!! Look forward to seeing pics when you make your final selection :D
ces1965
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:04 pm

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by ces1965 »

Thanks still getting together the money and getting marital approval
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Crazy to get 325c64?

Post by jps »

ces1965 wrote:Thanks still getting together the money and getting marital approval
I bet it would drive you nuts to get the second before the first!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Vintage 325 Models: by Glen Lambert”