Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

The short-scale model that changed history

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by LenMinNJ »

Do the 320/325 and 350/355 have the same size body?
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6371
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by paologregorio »

IIRC, same body, 3/4 neck vs. full scale.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
wj350
Advanced Member
Posts: 1675
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by wj350 »

My understanding....

The current 325 and 350 bodies are the same dimensions, but as Paul mentions, the scales are different.

The 325v59 and 325c58 (as well as the older vintage 325s, 310s and 315s) have thicker bodies (terms of depth) than the c64 and 350 (1.875" and 2.03" respectively compared to 1.5"), but otherwise are the same.

I have read some sources that earlier 320s ('58-'92 era) were slightly wider across the body than the newer 320, 325 and 350s (13.25" vs 12.75" respectively), but others have told me this isn't accurate, so I'm really not sure.

To my amateur's eye, there are also subtle nuances to sharpness in the horns, ramp angles, etc., but I'm guessing this is mostly due to differences in the build processes over the years (amount of hand shaping, sanding, etc.), with the modern CNC-cut bodies more consistent from one to the next.
"Let me take you down...'cause I'm going to...."
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by kiramdear »

wj350 wrote:
I have read some sources that earlier 320s ('58-'92 era) were slightly wider across the body than the newer 320, 325 and 350s (13.25" vs 12.75" respectively), but others have told me this isn't accurate, so I'm really not sure.
I think the difference, if any, is negligible. The thin ones, 320, 325, 350, are all about the same within tolerances and vary according to who did what that day (for the non-CNC). The thicker models, C58 and V59, were each completely re-tooled and look noticeably different; I'm not sure about the John Lennon models but I suspect so. Each era also looks different for the older ones on account of the patterns wearing down. My Eighties 320 has very soft horns when compared with a Sixties example.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by LenMinNJ »

Thanks.

There are sources on the Web that imply that Susanna Hoffs liked a smaller, thinner body with a 24-fret neck, and so Rickenbacker used a smaller, thinner body with a 350 neck for her 350SH.

Is that information apocryphal? Is the 350SH body a standard 325/350 body?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by sloop_john_b »

LenMinNJ wrote:Thanks.

There are sources on the Web that imply that Susanna Hoffs liked a smaller, thinner body with a 24-fret neck, and so Rickenbacker used a smaller, thinner body with a 350 neck for her 350SH.

Is that information apocryphal? Is the 350SH body a standard 325/350 body?
Not sure, but there is also a quote from one of the original 350SH builders (Probably from the Bacon & Day book) about the model "having a wider neck" which I always thought to be questionable.
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by octagon »

The horns on my v59 look "pointier" than the horns on my '83 320.

ImageImage
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by glen_l »

As the original question was simply whether the 320/325 has the same body size as the 350/355, I'll just clarify that the answer is substantially yes. There are some minor profile and edge differences between versions of the short scale (which is not 3/4 btw), but substantially, the body's of the short and fullscale version are the same.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by johnhall »

To answer the original question . . . the bodies are identical and come out of the same stack.

To answer some of the other questions raised . . .

Susanna Hoff's instrument used a bog standard neck and body.

Slightly different shapes and edge radii have been used over the years, relating to manufacturing technique, wear, and some other factors, but like I said at any one time, that stack of bodies could be used with either a short scale or full scale neck.
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by octagon »

Mr Hall,I remember reading that Rickenbacker only made one 350v59(photo below). Was there ever a 350 made with the c58 body?

Image
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by JakeK »

IIRC, I believe Craig Witty owns a one off Swamp Ash 325C58 body with a 330 neck.

Yep
Attachments
000_0001_5.jpg
000_0002_5.jpg
000_0004_3.jpg
000_0006_3.jpg
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

JakeK wrote:IIRC, I believe Craig Witty owns a one off Swamp Ash 325C58 body with a 330 neck.

Yep
Nope. 350.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13836
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by sloop_john_b »

RIC_FACTORY wrote:
JakeK wrote:IIRC, I believe Craig Witty owns a one off Swamp Ash 325C58 body with a 330 neck.

Yep
Nope. 350.
The sum of the parts equal a 350 (325-style body with normal scale neck), but which parts are from a 350? The neck has 24 frets (350's have 21) and the pickup spacing isn't consistent with the 350v63.
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by octagon »

sloop_john_b wrote:
RIC_FACTORY wrote:
JakeK wrote:IIRC, I believe Craig Witty owns a one off Swamp Ash 325C58 body with a 330 neck.

Yep
Nope. 350.
The sum of the parts equal a 350 (325-style body with normal scale neck), but which parts are from a 350? The neck has 24 frets (350's have 21) and the pickup spacing isn't consistent with the 350v63.
The 80's 350 Liverpools had 24 frets and the pickups spacing is like the 325.

Image
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Is the 325 Body Smaller Than A 350?

Post by johnhall »

sloop_john_b wrote:The sum of the parts equal a 350 (325-style body with normal scale neck), but which parts are from a 350? The neck has 24 frets (350's have 21) and the pickup spacing isn't consistent with the 350v63.
The original 350's had 24 fret necks, from the Model 330. The 350V63, really a fantasy vintage reissue, introduced the 21 fret neck.

Actually, there are no 350 parts at all- it's made up entirely from other models.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Vintage 325 Models: by Glen Lambert”