Question about colors/years
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Question about colors/years
I guess walnuts.
Re: Question about colors/years
I, too would almost certainly say Walnut, even without photos.
I think a botched FireGlo would be fairly obvious to you, and satin AutumnGlo is not only less common throughout the whole 70s/80s, it is even less so as late '86.
I think a botched FireGlo would be fairly obvious to you, and satin AutumnGlo is not only less common throughout the whole 70s/80s, it is even less so as late '86.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights do make a left.
Re: Question about colors/years
Speaking of "non-burst" versions of "bursts" ... remember some years ago that the factory put out a Fireglo red 620 that pretty much lacked a burst. Now that is a real oddity!
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
Re: Question about colors/years
Bob: Are you referring to an instrument you have seen or photos of instruments from 1986. Lighting can have be a significant factor in trying to identify finishes.
Based on your options listed in your question about the 1986 12 string, I would say that a variation of fireglo may be what you are seeing.
The following 1986 360/12V64 is from the RRF Register. It is leaning in the direction of autumnglo although the fireglo can still be identified.
Based on your options listed in your question about the 1986 12 string, I would say that a variation of fireglo may be what you are seeing.
The following 1986 360/12V64 is from the RRF Register. It is leaning in the direction of autumnglo although the fireglo can still be identified.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277