Page 9 of 35

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:21 pm
by johnhall
sloop_john_b wrote:
mikeyesfan wrote:When do we find out what the COY is?

2013?
The COY program appears to be over.

Prove me wrong. :wink:
We certainly haven't made that decision but there won't be one this year. It makes no sense to do something like this when there's no hope of delivering the product within the year. However, it seems like it would be a good idea if the delivery time is ultimately reduced.

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:25 pm
by sloop_john_b
johnhall wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:
mikeyesfan wrote:When do we find out what the COY is?

2013?
The COY program appears to be over.

Prove me wrong. :wink:
We certainly haven't made that decision but there won't be one this year. It makes no sense to do something like this when there's no hope of delivering the product within the year. However, it seems like it would be a good idea if the delivery time is ultimately reduced.
Sounds like a good idea to me too! :D

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:11 pm
by grygrx
Pumps fist for COY.

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:34 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
coy are pretty ! :roll:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:18 pm
by jch
Model of the year would be better.

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:08 pm
by ajish4
jch wrote:Model of the year would be better.
Hmmm, interesting concept, but surely would mess up the production schedule for sure.

But, I like the way you think! :wink: 8)

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:06 pm
by jps
jch wrote:Model of the year would be better.
Miss Rickenbacker to the runway, please! :mrgreen: 8)

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:33 pm
by cjj
jps wrote:
jch wrote:Model of the year would be better.
Miss Rickenbacker to the runway, please! :mrgreen: 8)
How do you know it'll always be a female model?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:52 pm
by jps
cjj wrote:
jps wrote:
jch wrote:Model of the year would be better.
Miss Rickenbacker to the runway, please! :mrgreen: 8)
How do you know it'll always be a female model?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Easy, those would be Mr. Rickenbacher.

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:41 pm
by mikeyesfan
johnhall wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:
mikeyesfan wrote:When do we find out what the COY is?

2013?
The COY program appears to be over.

Prove me wrong. :wink:
We certainly haven't made that decision but there won't be one this year. It makes no sense to do something like this when there's no hope of delivering the product within the year. However, it seems like it would be a good idea if the delivery time is ultimately reduced.
Thanks for the reply John, COY are cool.
Bring back the Black hardware too!
Good luck at NAMM..
but I'm not sure we want you to sell too many guitars @ Namm or you will never catch up with production, and we WANT COY 2013..LOL

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:18 pm
by electrofaro
I hope the 24 fret 360 WB will return... preferably in Burgundyglo! :mrgreen:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 4:47 pm
by Ivan3000
Wildberry wrote:I hope the 24 fret 360 WB will return... preferably in Burgundyglo! :mrgreen:
With Checkered binding! :wink:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:43 pm
by fluffy
IvanMunoz wrote:
Wildberry wrote:I hope the 24 fret 360 WB will return... preferably in Burgundyglo! :mrgreen:
With Checkered binding! :wink:
orrr.. a 4005 with that finish and binding :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:44 pm
by ajish4
I'm DYING for a 4004cii FL....PLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeze! :mrgreen:

Re: NAMM 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:45 pm
by cheyenne
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm......checker binding.