some registry cleanup

admin · Post by **admin** » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:01 am

Alas, not the rare find that we had hoped for.

Ontario_RIC_fan · Post by **Ontario_RIC_fan** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 5:53 pm

I am willing to bet that this guitar

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... model%3D61

and this guitar

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... model%3D61

Are in fact the same...

What do you think?

libratune · Post by **libratune** » Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:05 pm

Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:I am willing to bet that this guitar

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... model%3D61

and this guitar

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... model%3D61

Are in fact the same...

What do you think?

I think you would win that bet!

gibsonlp · Post by **gibsonlp** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:58 am

Fixed. thanks!

chrisdski · Post by **chrisdski** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:33 pm

I believe the 5 string Blackstar currently ID as B27331 should be H27331. The certificate pictured does list it as an August build, and the corrected serial puts it more in line with it's build # out of 200.

admin · Post by **admin** » Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:10 pm

Chris: This makes perfect sense to me and the record has been edited accordingly.

Ontario_RIC_fan · Post by **Ontario_RIC_fan** » Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:03 am

http://www.rickresource.com/register/vi ... =13616&bl=

Is this FH3112?

admin · Post by **admin** » Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:33 am

Brian: I believe so. I have asked the owner and await his reply.

thisismusicinc · Post by **thisismusicinc** » Sun May 09, 2010 1:24 pm

Isn't WC363 a 4001, not a 4003?

http://rickresource.com/register/viewit ... lebrity%3D

cjj · Post by **cjj** » Sun May 09, 2010 1:30 pm

thisismusicinc wrote:Isn't WC363 a 4001, not a 4003?

http://rickresource.com/register/viewit ... lebrity%3D

Yep! It's been fixed...

Thanks for finding that!

thisismusicinc · Post by **thisismusicinc** » Sun May 09, 2010 2:19 pm

I'm glad to help.

admin · Post by **admin** » Sun May 09, 2010 5:21 pm

Thanks Jon. We need all the help we can get.

doctorwho · Post by **doctorwho** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 am

Sorry for bringing this old thread back to life.

I added some limited edition collected items today from old compilation lists/eBay print-outs that I found while sorting through old 'to be filed' boxes of stuff. One thing I found that posed a challenge was the need to enter information when the serial number was not given in the ad. What I wound up doing was using the COA number as a guide and approximating the month and year, then using "XXXX" or "XXYY" for the missing numbers.

Is there perhaps a better way to indicate these "missing info" types of entries, or is how I did it good enough?

Seans · Post by **Seans** » Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:02 am

Performing an advanced search, 4 strings and 1970 only, I can see 8 entries that poss shouldn't be there. MC962 and 1108439 for sure.

http://www.rickresource.com/register/in ... celebrity=

gibsonlp · Post by **gibsonlp** » Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:37 am

Every time someone enters a wrong serial it automatically becomes unix epoch time 0 (1/1/1970), I will fix that. Thanks.

Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup

Re: some registry cleanup