I think that the shaped wooden cover looks "stuck on". My curious mind wants to know what's under there, and why did they cover it up?Spike- wrote:Finding a way to solve my neck plate problem is ever elusive. I guess the simple answer would be to 'get over it'
I don't see anything wrong with those plates. Neck plates have been done with more charming shapes (Mosrite, for example), but I don't think the softer shape adds any "warmth". I also don't think that "warmth" is needed--the appeal of solid-bodied electric guitar design is often centered on the contrast between wood/organic and metal/geometric, going right back to the Telecaster.
Also, in reading through this thread, I noticed the comment on the black plexi guard on my 481 MG/BT. It's original. I don't know how that tip got such a weird shape, except through wear on the routing pattern.
I prefer the 481 for the same reasons that you dislike it. The odd pickguard shape and slanted pickups and frets make this a really unique and intriguing guitar, visually, and I daresay that the MG/BT is the best-looking of all possible color combinations offered for this model--the black contrast with the maple is striking. The JG/white is the most common of the color combinations, and lacks charm IMO. Add to this the huge humbuckers and phase reversing switch, and you've got some nice sounds there!
I have zero problem with slanted frets, from a player's standpoint. I think that people who are dubious of them haven't played them enough (or at all) and are living too much in their heads re: playability.
Believe me, if you were playing a gig and for some reason a 481 was your only backup, you'd get used to it in a heartbeat.
BTW, my attraction to these models began when I restored a really beat-up JG 481 for Forumite Melissa Breitsprecher:
It played and sounded really nice...That's Gareth Holder's FG 4001 in the background...