Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by brycycle »

as noted in the for sale section, i've listed the C64S Jetglo i just received on ebay (for unforseen financial reasons).

a local buyer is after it - now i'm having second thoughts.

i've read Ben Hall's reasoning on why they produce them (while in production, the wood grain of some C64S' doesn't meet aesthetic standards).

as only a few dozen have been produced - do you forsee this being a rare/valuable bass in the future; or a compromise of the intended product?

i'm trying to convince myself to hold onto it. :wink:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37337
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by jps »

Rare! Does that help ? :mrgreen:
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by simer4001 »

Does rare equal greater value?
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by 1965 »

It's obviously more valuable to you than the normal S model, does it matter what anyone else thinks? There must be something else you could sell instead.
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by brycycle »

way ahead of you Wes...see the for sale section (1975 White/BT)
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by 1965 »

Well you're not that far ahead, I posted 10 mins before you. :P But yes, good decision. I'd definitely hold on to the C64S, what a cool bass.
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by brycycle »

1965 wrote:Well you're not that far ahead, I posted 10 mins before you. :P But yes, good decision. I'd definitely hold on to the C64S, what a cool bass.
touche. :lol:
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

I can't remember the last time we made one nor how many we have produced, so yeah, 'tis a rare beast indeed...
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by brycycle »

glad to hear that, Ben! i just parted with a '75 4001 instead...
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by simer4001 »

It can be both can't it?
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Weighing in on the Jetglo C64S - Rare or Compromise?

Post by deaconblues »

simer4001 wrote:It can be both can't it?
True (example: Antigua Fenders), although collector value is another story. Black instruments tend to go for less, even if they're rare. Still, I think it was a good choice to keep it...you won't see too many jetglo c64S.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”