Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kennyhowes »

"R" tailpiece bracket mounting holes. Did they change over the years? (i.e. were the early ones spread out differently?)

Image
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kiramdear »

I believe the answer is yes. Wes looked into it once when he was considering buying my '82 "R", and discovered that the holes wouldn't match the ones on his Sixties model. The whole tailpiece was different in the Sixties than it was in the Eighties.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by collin »

Yeah, the sixties versions had the screw holes slightly wider apart (it might be the other way around....I can't remember). If I can get some time and a screwdriver together in the next few days I'll take a picture.

I believe the actual tailpieces are the same, right? Only the brackets are different...? I'll need to compare those too.


It's not such a minute detail when you have to drill new holes in your guitar! Plus original-specs etc....
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kiramdear »

collin wrote:
I believe the actual tailpieces are the same, right? Only the brackets are different...? I'll need to compare those too.
Here's a thread where we discussed the differences. Too bad the pictures have been removed but there's more info about it.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=387384&p=520240&hil ... es#p520240
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by jps »

kiramdear wrote:Here's a thread where we discussed the differences. Too bad the pictures have been removed but there's more info about it.
That is why I prefer to attach my photos! :wink:
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kennyhowes »

Weird. I've changed the hardware on two of my '67 Rics and never run across this. Maybe it's the earlier ones that have the wider spacing?

Well ****. This means I need an early '60s "R" tailpiece bracket, stat. :roll:
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kennyhowes »

So...does anybody happen to have an earlier bracket? I looked through my stuff and thought I had one, but no.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kiramdear »

I think I heard that replacement brackets are available for the old style from another maker. I think my buyer mentioned that, but he wanted the upper part to be period, too.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by 1965 »

collin wrote:I believe the actual tailpieces are the same, right? Only the brackets are different...?
Definitely different. Vintage on the left. This one doesn't match the hole pattern on my '65. Seems like many (most?) of the vintage ones were drilled crooked/differently.

Image

Image

I did this to mine, kept the holes intact. I prefer the trapeze.

Image
User avatar
danm
Junior Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by danm »

I took the above comparison pics when I got that tailpiece (off a '66, I think?) to put on my '65.
The holes look drilled by hand to me since they're neither level, nor equal distances apart from the strap button.

* sorry the pics disappeared from that earlier thread. When I changed my Flickr preferences, it changed the urls of all my photos.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by collin »

Total long shot but does anybody want to trade a vintage 12 R for a vintage 6 string R, off a '66 330? No bracket swap though...
xcoyle
Intermediate Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:48 pm

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by xcoyle »

Great pics Wes. It looks like the string slots were cut after it was cast on the vintage, and the newer ones the string slots are part of the casting.
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4908
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by kennyhowes »

1965 wrote:Definitely different. Vintage on the left. This one doesn't match the hole pattern on my '65. Seems like many (most?) of the vintage ones were drilled crooked/differently.

Image

Image
The one on the left is what I'm looking for...looks like it'd work...

Y'learn something new about this stuff every day.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by collin »

collin wrote:Total long shot but does anybody want to trade a vintage 12 R for a vintage 6 string R, off a '66 330? No bracket swap though...

I will quote myself here and answer my own question! :oops:

Imagine my surprise when I dissasembled this 6 string parts guitar and found the R tailpiece was already cut for 12 strings (were they all like that?).
IMG_0357.JPG

You guys are right, the bracket holes are all funky---I think the drill meister was drunk the same day for yours and mine both, Dan. :lol:
IMG_0358.JPG

Also, is the casting usually this rough for the older R's ? They are definitely different than modern ones, for sure. Much flatter, and rougher.
IMG_0356.JPG
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Obscure minute detail technical question of the year

Post by jdogric12 »

I've seen lots of 12-string tp's on 6-strings, usually BT though.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”