The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by rickaddict »

Nice Job, Mark. I love the color, and the body edges look great (and must feel better too)!
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by rickaddict »

eddied wrote:For fun I thought I'd post an authenitc picture of the 4001S that I personally took at the old Boston Garden during the Wings Across America Tour. A super nice roadie acrtually let me get up close to take this and it is a precious treasure for me.
Boston garden 76.jpg
Is this the photo you tried to post, Eddie?

download/file.php?id=44389&mode=view

:?:
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6315
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by teeder »

It's way back on page 2.

This was a fun one to re-read! :shock: :roll:
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by rickaddict »

teeder wrote: This was a fun one to re-read! :shock: :roll:
+1

8)
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by walker »

Thanks, Jeff! (for the props on the work) :lol:
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by leftybass »

walker wrote:(Woops! There you go:)

Image

Image
That's really cool..may the best Wings-era replica I've ever seen. Well done..! :D
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Hotzenplotz »

That is just great!

There is only one thing I was thinking about:
Judging from the pictures Maccas bass has got a slightly different scratchplate. Compare the cut of the lower horn and its distance to the scratch plate. At Maccas bass the lower corner of the scratch plate does not seem to be parallel to the end of the fretboard. There seems to be a slight bow, in my eyes.

BTW: The cut of your bass is slightly deeper - compare with the both last frets. This is a thing You can not change. But, IMHO it is not a problem at all because the old days all of them were more or less completely handmade. There is no "right shape", it never has been. This was before the times of CNC.

- So again: Congraulations, very impressive!
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by walker »

You're right, Sascha. That difference is especially noticable given the difference in where the bottom body wings meet the fretboard - Paul's intersecting close to the 20th fret, Rick's intersecting closer to the edge of the fretboard. Sanding that PG down would definitely help it match more and compensate for the difference in the body wing shapes. An easy fix!
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Hotzenplotz »

I like to care about these details.

Actually I am working on a Telecaster kit. I want it looking like 1960 or something like that.
These small details make a difference - and it is a nice puzzle to discover all the differences.

In the end You know literally everything about Your instrument. Isn't that nice?!
- And Yours is something to be proud of!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6315
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by teeder »

may the best Wings-era replica I've ever seen.
Ya, but the lines on the knobs are facing the wrong directions!
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Hotzenplotz »

:shock:

And the grain is different, too!
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by wim »

Except for the grain issue, some remarks.

The upper horn looks smaller on the macca bass.
There's the cutaway and scratchplate issue mentioned above
The scratchplate near the jack is not parallel to the body contour on the macca bass
Also the bridge pup surround is more square on the original.
And it could be the angle of the picture taken, but the tailpiece doesn't look perpendicular to the centerline of the neck on the original.
Very small issues, i know.

Edit: some spelling issues corrected. :lol:
Attachments
4exy.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37151
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by jps »

:shock: Don't forget about that gouge in the bass bout above the back edge of the bridge pickup! :shock:
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Hotzenplotz »

jps wrote::shock: Don't forget about that gouge in the bass bout above the back edge of the bridge pickup! :shock:
That is quite an easy repair!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Hotzenplotz »

Hotzenplotz wrote:
jps wrote::shock: Don't forget about that gouge in the bass bout above the back edge of the bridge pickup! :shock:
That is quite an easy repair!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
- I hasitated to mention it...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”