Poor old 4000
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Poor old 4000
A few weeks ago I got my hands on this Cliff Burton-ized Rick 4000. It's built in July 1975 and has a wonderfull neck, but has seen better days.
With some work this could become a real nice player!
The good:
- The neck doesn't seem to collapse into the body
- The bridge pickup is original and sounds amazing
- Most of the hardware is original and working fine
The bad:
- The frets on the lower register are worn down
- The neck pickup is very poorly installed
- The electronics are fried, probably been installed by someone with little knowledge of soldering
- It looks like someone tried to carve new slots in the nut with a hacksaw
For now, I'm thinking of converting this to a pre-1974 4001S, a bit like this:
More pics (not for the faint of heart)
With some work this could become a real nice player!
The good:
- The neck doesn't seem to collapse into the body
- The bridge pickup is original and sounds amazing
- Most of the hardware is original and working fine
The bad:
- The frets on the lower register are worn down
- The neck pickup is very poorly installed
- The electronics are fried, probably been installed by someone with little knowledge of soldering
- It looks like someone tried to carve new slots in the nut with a hacksaw
For now, I'm thinking of converting this to a pre-1974 4001S, a bit like this:
More pics (not for the faint of heart)
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13836
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Poor old 4000
There was a mudbucker in my 68 when I got it. It blended great with original pickup. Either way it's win/ win.
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: Poor old 4000
Can't say I love it, but if the price were right, I probably would have added it to the stable anyway. Seems like it has a lot of potential. (And I love mid-70s Ric necks.)sloop_john_b wrote:Man. I love that as-is.
I admit, I'm curious how the giant lego brick pickup sounds. Congrats on the cool new (to you) bass, OP!
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6553
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Poor old 4000
I WAS going to ask why you thought it was a 4000 and not a 4001S, but after I saw the shot of the routing for the neck pickup, I see that you've nailed it. This is an example of the mid-'70s "set neck" 4000, somewhat crudely converted to a "4001S." The contemporary 4001S had the same chassis as the 4000. Looks like a sleeper!
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Re: Poor old 4000
You couldn’t tell that just by looking at the first picture, with no skunk stripebassduke49 wrote:I WAS going to ask why you thought it was a 4000 and not a 4001S, but after I saw the shot of the routing for the neck pickup, I see that you've nailed it. This is an example of the mid-'70s "set neck" 4000, somewhat crudely converted to a "4001S." The contemporary 4001S had the same chassis as the 4000. Looks like a sleeper!
Re: Poor old 4000
I'm wondering, seeing that route, if the neck joint is stable? There could not be much wood left.
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6553
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: Poor old 4000
No. Because a '75 4000 and a '75 4001S would both have the set neck with the shedua (skunk stripe) neck.collin wrote:You couldn’t tell that just by looking at the first picture, with no skunk stripebassduke49 wrote:I WAS going to ask why you thought it was a 4000 and not a 4001S, but after I saw the shot of the routing for the neck pickup, I see that you've nailed it. This is an example of the mid-'70s "set neck" 4000, somewhat crudely converted to a "4001S." The contemporary 4001S had the same chassis as the 4000. Looks like a sleeper!
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Re: Poor old 4000
A mid-70s 4001S had a set neck? Didn't realize that.bassduke49 wrote:No. Because a '75 4000 and a '75 4001S would both have the set neck with the shedua (skunk stripe) neck.collin wrote:You couldn’t tell that just by looking at the first picture, with no skunk stripebassduke49 wrote:I WAS going to ask why you thought it was a 4000 and not a 4001S, but after I saw the shot of the routing for the neck pickup, I see that you've nailed it. This is an example of the mid-'70s "set neck" 4000, somewhat crudely converted to a "4001S." The contemporary 4001S had the same chassis as the 4000. Looks like a sleeper!
I always look for the stripe down by the tailpiece to check if it's a set neck or not.
Re: Poor old 4000
Yes, starting around 1974-ish. Maybe, 1973.collin wrote:A mid-70s 4001S had a set neck?
Re: Poor old 4000
Not entirely surprised. 1973 seems to be a major dividing line for all kinds of production details (large and small..), on most of the lineup.jps wrote:Yes, starting around 1974-ish. Maybe, 1973.collin wrote:A mid-70s 4001S had a set neck?
Re: Poor old 4000
'73. My old '73 4000 was a set neck. That was the most aggressive-sounding bass I've ever played, and I've played literally thousands of basses at all price points.
Re: Poor old 4000
Nice score. If it were mine, I'd restore it to a 4000. Plug those nasty holes.
Re: Poor old 4000
There's not much you can't do with a good sounding bridge PU in a Rick.henry5 wrote:'73. My old '73 4000 was a set neck. That was the most aggressive-sounding bass I've ever played, and I've played literally thousands of basses at all price points.