Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
akpasta
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:46 pm

Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by akpasta »

Hey everyone,

I have an early 80s 360/12 with the vintage 7.25" radius neck / fingerboard / fretboard. I've got TI flats on it. I'm currently using a shubb capo with a 7.25 radius. It works, but it doesn't work that well. It doesn't seem to put enough tension on the .10 and .13 strings, and causes them to buzz. If I tighten the capo down with enough tension to stop that buzzing it puts way too much tension on the neck (which will cause frets to wear faster) and causes the low strings to go way sharp. Seems a different capo is required, something with a more curved radius (don't think that exists) or something with different rubber that accommodates for the different gauges.

G7th makes a "12 string capo" with notches in the rubber, but they're shaped for normal string orientation, not Rick reverse orientation hahaha. So no luck there. https://www.g7th.com/12-string

Thalia, G7th, etc. All kinda pricey so I don't want to blindly buy them.

These Paige capos look interesting - http://allaboutcapos.com/product/paige- ... ius-black/ - Of course they "say" they're for a 12 string, but I also wonder if the design could theoretically accommodate any fretboard radius, since it appears to pull down on the capo from both sides, and form to the radius. I wonder?

Anyone have any recommendations?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37138
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by jps »

You can bend the arm on the Shubb to alter the radius some, enough to fix your issue with it. I did so with one of mine to better work with the guitar I use it on.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by collin »

I have had no problems using a Kyser capo on any 12-string (or any other guitar for that matter) and I don't believe I own a Rickenbacker that doesn't have a 7.25" radius.

https://www.kysermusical.com/
akpasta
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 6:46 pm

Re: Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by akpasta »

collin wrote:I have had no problems using a Kyser capo on any 12-string (or any other guitar for that matter) and I don't believe I own a Rickenbacker that doesn't have a 7.25" radius.

https://www.kysermusical.com/
What year Ricks do you have? They changed at some point. Rickenbaker themselves now say it has a 10” radius. I’ve found corroboration online that the vintage radius is 7.25 and the new ones are not.

I’ve read good and bad on the kysers but they’re definitely cheap enough to try.
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 600
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by scott_s »

One thing to note is that the early fretboards often had tighter (like 6") and inconsistent radii up and down the neck, due to the way the radius was hand-sanded into the fretboards. You might be running into that.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Best Rick 360/12 Capo for 7.25" radius

Post by collin »

akpasta wrote:
collin wrote:I have had no problems using a Kyser capo on any 12-string (or any other guitar for that matter) and I don't believe I own a Rickenbacker that doesn't have a 7.25" radius.

https://www.kysermusical.com/
What year Ricks do you have? They changed at some point. Rickenbaker themselves now say it has a 10” radius. I’ve found corroboration online that the vintage radius is 7.25 and the new ones are not.

I’ve read good and bad on the kysers but they’re definitely cheap enough to try.
All mine are pre-1974 models, which are 7.25” radius.

They didn’t switch to 10” radius until the 1980s.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”