The "C" and "V" series
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
I guess I'm surprised that so many folks complain about the price of the 'C-Series' guitars. Looking through several 'mail order' catalogs that I get on a regular basis show that some of the other companies 'vintage series' guitars are just as high or not higher! The Gibson Peter Frampton re-issue costs an arm and two legs compared to the Ric'C-Series'. Having myself paid upwards of $4 grand for a Gibson ES-340 natural finish I guess the price tag of the Ric 'C-Series' doesn't seem to be all that bad.
Just my 2 cents...
Just my 2 cents...
I think maybe there is a misunderstanding here or at least debate on what "different" means.
Guille72's point is that a v63 and c64 are both Ricks in black, short scale w/3 big shiny pups and a whammy. A 320,325,325v63,325JL are all the same thing when you play them. Much like a '54 Strat and a '72 Strat are both Strats, however different
stylistically.
Now Nick's IS correct that everything is changed on the c64, in that the body contours are reshaped to '64 style, the pups are wound correct w/ flat screws, wiring harness, whammy... on and on..
I suppose its all in what you're looking for. A great player 320 series or an EXACT copy of a Beatle guitar.
I just miss the V series. Why cancel the 1997,381 or 4001v63??... not Beatle guitars.. no need to ax 'em!
Guille72's point is that a v63 and c64 are both Ricks in black, short scale w/3 big shiny pups and a whammy. A 320,325,325v63,325JL are all the same thing when you play them. Much like a '54 Strat and a '72 Strat are both Strats, however different
stylistically.
Now Nick's IS correct that everything is changed on the c64, in that the body contours are reshaped to '64 style, the pups are wound correct w/ flat screws, wiring harness, whammy... on and on..
I suppose its all in what you're looking for. A great player 320 series or an EXACT copy of a Beatle guitar.
I just miss the V series. Why cancel the 1997,381 or 4001v63??... not Beatle guitars.. no need to ax 'em!