My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

clementc3
Member
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:22 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by clementc3 »

If you get bitten by the "gotta-restore-it-as-close-as-possible-to-original-condition" bug, there is a reputed 1966 convertible comb on ebay now (May 4, 2010) for $599 BIN.

http://cgi.ebay.com/1966-RICKENBACKER-3 ... 19bc0706f1

Or, as Collin pointed out, Winfield Vintage sells a new version for $180, or the whole kit for $300. Either way, you have to really want to do it, though.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6951
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by collin »

clementc3 wrote:If you get bitten by the "gotta-restore-it-as-close-as-possible-to-original-condition" bug, there is a reputed 1966 convertible comb on ebay now (May 4, 2010) for $599 BIN.
:shock: Wow, that's expensive.


Wouldn't make sense on a guitar that will already be modded far past "original parts" making a difference or not. Winfield's are top-notch, too.
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4254
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by libratune »

"The convertible models (366,336,456) have kind of an oddball appeal, but to do a 366 resto is extra money and hardware on a guitar that is never going to be stock again (refin, neck binding, fretboard?). . . . I don't think you'd be doing an injustice to just treat it like a 360-12 and go from there. In short, I wouldn't complicate things by going down the 366 resto path."

Just sayin' . . .
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by kiramdear »

Ron I agree with you and find no harm in either path that one could take here.
All I wanna do is rock!
xpitt
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:38 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by xpitt »

User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6951
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by collin »

kiramdear wrote:Ron I agree with you and find no harm in either path that one could take here.

Yup. Best thing about a dog of a guitar is that you have nowhere to go but UP. Almost anything will improve it!


xpitt wrote:Bruce, there is a comb on ebay..

http://cgi.ebay.com/1966-RICKENBACKER-3 ... 19bc0706f1
Look at the top of the 2nd page, Alex. :lol:
User avatar
tonewoods
New member
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:58 am

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by tonewoods »

collin wrote:

Yup. Best thing about a dog of a guitar is that you have nowhere to go but UP. Almost anything will improve it!

OK, I'm leaning towards a reliced Jetglow 360/12...

Anyone happen to know the binding thickness around the F-hole (Is that what they're called around here?).... :oops:
And where did they stick the joint?

And what is the body binding thickness on the back??

Thanks all!!
This should be fun...
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6371
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by paologregorio »

tonewoods wrote:
Here's a funny story...
I'm playing a gig here on the island, and this guy comes up and says "that's my old guitar"!
He proudly tells me how cool it is "now that all that plastic is gone"... :shock:

Needless to say, I was not as impressed... :wink:

So-ooo, what colors are period correct for 1967??
Is Burgundy an option??

Thanks all...
Really appreciate it....
Bruce
I's say go with AZ Blue, or Burgandy if you're going with period colors, but you could also go with bright fire engine RED if you want something really different. It's a Rick color, but wasn't available until the 80s/90s. :D


At least you didn't punch him in the head or anything...or did you? :lol:
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6951
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by collin »

tonewoods wrote:



OK, I'm leaning towards a reliced Jetglow 360/12...

Anyone happen to know the binding thickness around the F-hole (Is that what they're called around here?).... :oops:
And where did they stick the joint?

And what is the body binding thickness on the back??

Thanks all!!
This should be fun...
Nice plan!

We call it a "sound hole" around here, because a F-hole looks like a "F" :)

I stick my joint between the strings and the headstock, until I need a little hit. :lol:


ps...don't relic! :)
Last edited by collin on Wed May 05, 2010 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tonewoods
New member
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:58 am

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by tonewoods »

collin wrote:
ps...don't relic! :)
Well, don't want to open up that can of worms... :wink:
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6371
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by paologregorio »

And whatever you do, don't use any lice!
xpitt
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:38 pm

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by xpitt »

collin wrote:
xpitt wrote:Bruce, there is a comb on ebay..

http://cgi.ebay.com/1966-RICKENBACKER-3 ... 19bc0706f1
Look at the top of the 2nd page, Alex. :lol:
Well, maybe it's because I turned 60 ... :shock: :roll: shock'n'roll
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by jdogric12 »

Bump - I just received this from Mr. Tonewoods. It's much better than this thread would lead you to believe. The checker binding is in great shape, only the outer white binding is missing.

The neck could use a reset. It's just bad enough to need one.

I think I may just try to paint over the fretboard inlays. I imagine it would take heat to get them out of there, and the neck is otherwise decent, so I don't want to risk damaging it (further).

Plugged in, the pickups sound great! Although the wiring harness is a little goofy - got re-wired incorrectly at some point. I think it's just knobs in the wrong places, not wrong wiring.

I happen to have a spare 366 resto kit lying around, so that will finally come in handy, since I've never found a 360/12v64 cheap enough (again) to warrant purchasing to "upgrade" and flip.

I think I'll leave the finish as is - I can play it out without worrying about dinging it :)
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7095
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by scotty »

Congrats mate lets go into attack formation.....Engage.
sorry Topgun was on the other night...
User avatar
tonewoods
New member
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:58 am

Re: My '67 360/12 Restoration Project...

Post by tonewoods »

Love to see that thing get the full restoration treatment, but it's also a great sounding guitar as is...

I didn't mess with the wiring, but i know who did...
It had a teak ( :shock: ) pickguard installed, so got that off of there...

Love to see pics if you do indeed get some paint on her...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”