Um, Gibson???
Re: Um, Gibson???
No offense to Gibson, but I personally don't like it very much.
It looks to much like that typical off brand bass.
It looks to much like that typical off brand bass.
Re: Um, Gibson???
It seems like design team at Gibson just pulls random ideas out of a hat and then just toss up their hands and say, "That'l work" lets go to lunch!
"Knowledge is Power"
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Um, Gibson???
Ditto that!antipodean wrote:My thoughts exactly Werner - combining the look of two iconic instruments and coming up with something not quite as good as either....Wildberry wrote: It looks like the child of Fender and Mosrite Bass...
There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6371
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Um, Gibson???
Exactly!IvanMunoz wrote:No offense to Gibson, but I personally don't like it very much.
It looks to much like that typical off brand bass.
There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
Re: Um, Gibson???
Of course, that could have been their plan all along, or perhaps they created this bass so that us folks on the RRF would have something to debate!paologregorio wrote:Exactly!IvanMunoz wrote:No offense to Gibson, but I personally don't like it very much.
It looks to much like that typical off brand bass.
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Um, Gibson???
Henry personally approves every design, actually...cheyenne wrote:It seems like design team at Gibson just pulls random ideas out of a hat and then just toss up their hands and say, "That'l work" lets go to lunch!
Anyway, how many people who say they do not like it actually tried it, played it? Well?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Re: Um, Gibson???
The local stores need to have it in stock on the wall for us to try it.Wildberry wrote:Henry personally approves every design, actually...
Anyway, how many people who say they do not like it actually tried it, played it? Well?
Re: Um, Gibson???
Gibson has reissued the Non-Reverse T-Bird, definately would like to check it out!!woodyng wrote:Ummm,NO. I've only ever been tempted by 3 Gibson bass designs,2 of which are not in production. (Nonreverse tbird,and the eb1.)
The third is the venerable reverse t bird,but even that design,while quite possibly being the coolest looking rock and roll bass ever,is not so great for feel and ergonomics....
This one is just another kind of OK looking bass at boutique pricing....
Even better would be if they reissued the 60's epiphone EMBASSY,WHICH WAS THE BEST TBIRD OF THEM ALL.
http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... -Bass.aspx
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Um, Gibson???
No surprises there...Henry must be a gold-plated-dolphin-faucet kinda guy.Wildberry wrote: Henry personally approves every design, actually...
He's not exactly knockin' 'em out of thr park.
Between this thing and the FBX, my eyes hurt.
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Um, Gibson???
That model will be discontinued before Santa can deliver it to youbasmansam wrote:Gibson has reissued the Non-Reverse T-Bird, definately would like to check it out!!
jingle_jangle wrote:No surprises there...Henry must be a gold-plated-dolphin-faucet kinda guy.
Keep an eye on Gibson in November - I bet this thread could turn interesting around that time
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Re: Um, Gibson???
+1basmansam wrote:Gibson has reissued the Non-Reverse T-Bird, definately would like to check it out!!woodyng wrote:Ummm,NO. I've only ever been tempted by 3 Gibson bass designs,2 of which are not in production. (Nonreverse tbird,and the eb1.)
The third is the venerable reverse t bird,but even that design,while quite possibly being the coolest looking rock and roll bass ever,is not so great for feel and ergonomics....
This one is just another kind of OK looking bass at boutique pricing....
Even better would be if they reissued the 60's epiphone EMBASSY,WHICH WAS THE BEST TBIRD OF THEM ALL.
http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... -Bass.aspx
"Knowledge is Power"
Re: Um, Gibson???
I was just at GC yesterday, it wasn't there, I looked special for it.jps wrote:The local stores need to have it in stock on the wall for us to try it.Wildberry wrote:Henry personally approves every design, actually...
Anyway, how many people who say they do not like it actually tried it, played it? Well?
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Um, Gibson???
While you were at GC, did you see this Halloween Special?
It's approved by Henry and is a preview of their latest design:
It's approved by Henry and is a preview of their latest design: