1997 VB

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
jaybyrd
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:15 pm

1997 VB

Post by jaybyrd »

Are these Ricks with the vibrato attached hard to keep in tune? If so, will removing the vibrato arm help? I am considering getting one of these and am curious. Any comments would be appreciated.
Nothing compares to the sound of a Rick 12 with a JangleBox and a touch of chorus.
jaybyrd
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:15 pm

Post by jaybyrd »

OK. Maybe not.
Nothing compares to the sound of a Rick 12 with a JangleBox and a touch of chorus.
axel

Post by axel »

Jaybyrd,
the only experience I've had was putting one on a 320 and it was hell - impossible to keep in tune... even without using the accent. (strings were .12-.52) I kept it for a week and played it quite a lot - it seemed like the strings would never settle down...

Maybe it was the shortscale, maybe the accent, maybe both ; but I will never put one of these on any of my ricks.
The same lad who asked me to do the 320 mod. left me his v59 (bigsby) for a week - by far better : it does stay in tune (but don't go reach for the octave) and nicer feel also.
jaybyrd
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 133
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2001 4:15 pm

Post by jaybyrd »

Thanks, Axel.

That is what I was afraid of. I saw a used 1997VB and was considering buying it, but it seemed that I remembered some time ago someone saying the same sort of thing that you did. I think I will just continue to search for a 1997 without the VB. I appreciate your help.
Nothing compares to the sound of a Rick 12 with a JangleBox and a touch of chorus.
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

I have a '66 335 with the accent vibrato. It stays in tune just fine; if you're just doing little Ventures type twangy stuff no problem. You won't be playing any Van Halen stuff though. The only bump I've hit is I have to use a light gauge of strings for the arm to clear the volume knobs. Now, my mid 80's 325 was a different story...
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1204
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Post by rkbsound »

Funny, because I have the same guitar as Chuck. I use heavy strings to KEEP it in tune. It was terrible with lighter strings. I have no arm on the Accent, so it's not an issue for me.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

The Accent still exists, of course, only for historical reasons, certainly not for its good operation. However, I think it's fair to say the same about a Bigsby as well.

In the case of a 3/4 scale guitar like a 325, string choice is quite critical with the Accent. The standard 12-16-24W-32-42-54 (equivalent to light strings on a full scale) is really the minimum weight set that should be used if tuning is to be maintained.

On a full scale guitar, it's nowhere near as critical and the 10-13-17-26-34-42 is a good starting point. One notch heavier and there should be no tuning problems. Just bend the arm to clear the knobs.

Let's just not lose sight of the fact that the Accent is a 1950's design and elegant for the era at that. But it can't begin to be considered in the same terms of modern vibrato units, such as our Hi Tech. It's a trade-off between looks and simplicity vs. performance.
axel

Post by axel »

On which model(s) is the 'HiTech' available? I just scouted the RIC site again and found no notice of its existence..
Would it be a soon-to-appear novelty, ready to be unveiled with a redesigned 650 series ?

a
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

Try this:

650 Overview
justonwo

Post by justonwo »

This page actually shows a nice close-up of the 650 vibrato unit. Looks like an EXCELLENT bridge to me . . .

http://personal.nbnet.nb.ca/mccorp/feature650D.html
User avatar
sir_andrew_of_left_coast
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am

Post by sir_andrew_of_left_coast »

Hey! That's MY guitar, Juston!
;-)
Member #03
User avatar
sir_andrew_of_left_coast
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am

Post by sir_andrew_of_left_coast »

Regarding the "name" of this vibrato...

On the Special Order Options page:

http://www.rickenbacker.com/us/options.htm

...it is called a "High performance vibrato system."

From the Component and Assembly Diagrams section:

http://www.rickenbacker.com/pdf/vibratos.pdf

...(scroll down to bottom) it is called a "Hi-Tek Vibrato Assembly."

Above, JH called it "Hi Tech."

Hi Tech, High Performance, Hi-Tek... take your pick. It's a good unit!
Member #03
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Post by johnhall »

It's the "Not-an-Accent, Not-a-Bigsy" vibrato. But Hi-Tek is actually the correct name, no matter what I called it before.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”