Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

This pretty 4001c64 has some significant taillift. Read that this model is known for that. Does the bridge differs from a v63 and cs because those have less. Any solution for this other than a new bridge? I used to clamp the black bridges with succes but this is of course different material. Thanks!...

anoukane wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:53 pm

I guess those Rickresource oldattachments are gone forever right?

Thanks for sharing Paul and thanks for the nice book.
And let me buy one of your Rickenbackers in the past. Never forget you shipped it out before receiving the payment.

No it shouldnt. Just wanted to have some experts to take a look at it.

I might get this Autumnglo.
It's from '79.

What do you think about the truss rods and the frets?

I emailed them if they could accept 3k because of the altered electronics and added pickup. They probably won’t

Thanks a lot for that info.
I love this place.

And all the 3261 examples in the register the fhole doesnt have binding. The one in your book at page 41 might have it.
The jetglo in the picture does. Maybe that isn’t original as well.

Yeah I agree. Not very tasteful.

Thanks Paul. I’ve seen one or two jetglos with f-hole. One in the register.

Were there every 3261 basses produced with binding WB double binding?

I’ve had that(inadequate tang/spring tension) before on a 78. That was my first suspicion also

Thanks guys.
Didn't have a proper pencil eraser so I used sandpaper with 800 grit.
Worked like magic.

Very happy!

Thanks!

Good price. Should sell I guess.

I read that 600 grit paper might work.
But Im not sure if thats a wise thing to do?