480XC

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

480XC

Post by bottom4 »

Question for those 480 players. It seems there may be some design difference from the original 480 and the 480XC, however could you share your opinion on what guitar (if any) that it may compare to such as a tele or strat etc...?

I really like the looks of the 480XC JG but would like to know where it sits in my arsenal.

Thanks!
Andy
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13835
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 480XC

Post by sloop_john_b »

It’s hard to draw a parallel between a guitar like this and almost anything else on the market, namely due to the construction: neck-through, solid-maple body.

Conventional wisdom states that this is going to be a bright guitar straightaway, based on construction alone. Top it off with two scatterwound toaster pickups, and you are definitely looking at bright, “jangly” guitar.

One advantage that this has over other Rickenbacker 6-strings is that the neck pickup is not right up against the end of the fretboard - this should make for a less woofy/dark neck pickup (I find the neck pickup on Rickenbackers pretty much unusable generally).
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2062
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Re: 480XC

Post by bottom4 »

Thanks, John! I appreciate your opinion. Hope you’ve been well! I miss our friend at mandolin bros...
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by electrofaro »

Neck and p/u seem to be similar low style like 650s due to the tailpiece
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12522
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by doctorwho »

The original 480s had a very flat (non-radiused) fretboard; it's likely that the 480XC does not carry that feature into the 21st century ... 8)
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
arbiter
Member
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:06 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by arbiter »

I'd be most curious about the size and feel of this neck. I loved the very flat and thin neck on an original 480.
User avatar
arbiter
Member
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:06 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by arbiter »

Anyone around here pick one of these up and want to report out/give a review?
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 480XC

Post by jdogric12 »

Spence got one, just search on here. He posted about it..


Just to correct something I noticed earlier in this thread... the 480XC supposedly has hot toasters, not scatterwounds. Can't wait for my JG to arrive! The 4005XC's are amazing so I expect the same in the guitar.

It's funny, it just occurred to me, they made a guitar-like bass, and a bass-like guitar!
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by electrofaro »

jdogric12 wrote:Spence got one, just search on here. He posted about it..
Tried that, every post that comes up I've read already, no review of any 480XC to be found searching!? :?: :shock:

After much thinking I decided not to get one. If you get yours Jason, please make a video!

For 100th they should do a 360/380 mashup without ramp with some sort of tailpiece bridge combo like on the 380s and 1993Plus neck width :mrgreen:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 480XC

Post by jdogric12 »

User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 480XC

Post by electrofaro »

Hah, I read that one, Jason. I was expecting more of a review.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
sir_andrew_of_left_coast
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am

Re: 480XC

Post by sir_andrew_of_left_coast »

electrofaro wrote:Hah, I read that one, Jason. I was expecting more of a review.
That terse post of mine was merely to address the concern that people wouldn't be seeing these guitars until Christmas or later.

Anyway, I'm guessing Jason was recalling a post I wrote in the RRF page on Facebook. I was a bit more "wordy" there. :wink:

I believe in the past, Jason has owned guitars equipped with the hotter "pre-Scatterwound" Toasters and... when he gets his, will be able to vouch for my suspicion that these "hotter" Toasters in the 480XC are similar sounding.

I have compared my 480XC with my 660 and can perceive the difference, which was quite as expected. The 660 being more "jangly" ... and the 480 being more "ballsy" (for lack of a better term). However, using the "pull" feature on the bridge pickup's tone knob on the 480 gets it a little closer to a jangly sound.

While both of mine play well, I might have to give the nod to the 480. Maybe it's because the Schaller bridge has rollers? Or because it sits lower? Whatever it is, the 480 plays just a slight bit easier in my opinion.

The 480 has the standard neck width, but the neck shape (the backside) feels the same as my 660. Switching between them is quite seamless for me.

From an aesthetic standpoint, they are both gorgeous. My 660 is mapleglo and very flamey. But the 480 is just as flamey... and it has that lovely Tobacco-glo finish, too.

If there is anything "specific" you wanted to know... ask away! :)
Member #03
User avatar
sir_andrew_of_left_coast
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am

Re: 480XC

Post by sir_andrew_of_left_coast »

jdogric12 wrote:It's funny, it just occurred to me, they made a guitar-like bass, and a bass-like guitar!
Yes, it appears some experimental "cross-breeding" has taken place. 8)
Member #03
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 480XC

Post by admin »

Andrew the 1970s 480 fretboard radius was very flat. How does your new 480XC feel compared to the radius of the 660?
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
sir_andrew_of_left_coast
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2000 6:38 am

Re: 480XC

Post by sir_andrew_of_left_coast »

It feels the same. I'm sure it's the 10" radius that other Rick guitars have. It's certainly not flat.
Member #03
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”