Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Korladis
Junior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2019 5:44 pm

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by Korladis »

cassius987 wrote:I love the official Rickenbacker bridge that was recently released. It's on my 4003AC. Wonderful. I just wish the tailpiece teeth/mute would be taken out of a future design to make palm muting a bit easier. It's far from impossible as-is, but not optimal.
Honestly I never palm mute on bass. I've tried. Just don't find myself liking how it sounds.

My 4001 has a Hipshot and I've been thinking about modifying it to accept Babicz saddles because while the tailpiece part overall is very solid, the saddles themselves are a little flimsy.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6229
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by cheyenne »

Any more progress on this?
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6229
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass

Post by cheyenne »

"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass

Post by thx1955 »

cheyenne wrote:Here it is!

https://www.fullcontacthardware.com/fch ... ***-bridge

Pretty pricey.
That's a very nice looking Bridge, preserves the original Rickenbacker style, it looks like a very solid piece of machinery
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by aceonbass »

This looks clunky and very much like an add-on part. At $169.00 it's WAY overpriced. He should have designed it as part of a compete assembly without a mute for that price. At only $21 less than the new V2 from RIC, this makes no sence.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by jps »

aceonbass wrote:This looks clunky and very much like an add-on part. At $169.00 it's WAY overpriced. He should have designed it as part of a compete assembly without a mute for that price. At only $21 less than the new V2 from RIC, this makes no sence.
Agreed!
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12522
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by doctorwho »

jps wrote:
aceonbass wrote:... no sence.
Agreed!
So you agree to misspell "sense" as "sence"? Please come to your census! :shock: :lol: 8)
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
Lightyear
New member
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:23 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by Lightyear »

I already have a Babicz on a Precision Bass and I really like it. The neck on my 4003W needs adjustment anway so I probably order one and will do (or let it be done) at the same time. I will post pictures/review when it happened.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37132
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by jps »

doctorwho wrote:
jps wrote:
aceonbass wrote:... no sence.
Agreed!
So you agree to misspell "sense" as "sence"? Please come to your census! :shock: :lol: 8)
Ad leest, mi spelink eeze korecht. :mrgreen:
Korladis
Junior Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2019 5:44 pm

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by Korladis »

aceonbass wrote:This looks clunky and very much like an add-on part. At $169.00 it's WAY overpriced. He should have designed it as part of a compete assembly without a mute for that price. At only $21 less than the new V2 from RIC, this makes no sence.
I like that it preserves the mute functionality, but I agree that it's overpriced for what it is.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10853
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by jdogric12 »

I've priced out custom metal stuff like this and it ain't cheap. I think this is a decent price... BUT in the wake of the availability of the RIC V2 bridge, it makes the V2 the no-brainer unfortunately. The FCH would have sold like hot cakes 10 years ago. Who knows, maybe it still will. I certainly appreciate the effort they put into this and hope they don't lose money on the operation.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by teeder »

I've priced out custom metal stuff like this and it ain't cheap. I think this is a decent price...
+1!
User avatar
thx1955
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2823
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by thx1955 »

teeder wrote:
I've priced out custom metal stuff like this and it ain't cheap. I think this is a decent price...
+1!
+2
"It's Red Jim, but not as we know it...."
Benjamin
Junior Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by Benjamin »

I just took a look at Babicz website and I can't actually knock the concept. I am sure it is a viable alternative, but I don't get it.

In context of my 4003 (y2k build) there are a few things that irk me. I am still running a standard bridge, which has a little bit of tail lift, but I can still get the action I want. Not long after I purchased it, I installed a new set of saddles and filed these myself, because either the factory didn't do a perfect job on string spacing, or the previous owner messed it up.

A little bit of treble pickup reassembly and new saddle slots had her lined up perfectly. I think we all know just how far out these things can be from factory, or previous mods, or age.

So I look at the Babicz and think, what?

1. No orthogonal (sideways) adjustment? We would have to assume this bridge has the perfect spacing already. What if it doesn't? My other main bass has a Hipshot B I think, which has sideways saddle barrel adjustment. Now that's a bridge!

2. Adjusting intonation requires loosening the side grub screws which are effectively JAMMING ALL THE SADDLES TOGETHER, relying purely on friction/interference to stop them from moving?!?!

Is this how it works? In that case, if I loosen the grubs, then I risk other saddles moving accidentally, or completely out of whack. What if I am clumsy and bump the bass, or tilt it while adjusting, does it have to lay absolutely flat?

So I can't play, tweak, play etc to adjust intonation based on an average of my playing heaviness to ensure it is right across the board?

If my tail lifts any more, I would probably go a V2. Honestly I don't have a problem with V1, except maybe the saddle block tilting, but I find that actually helpful - moving it a string winding or two as weather and conditions dictate, to fine tune intonation. It ain't hard to get the little screwdriver out to quickly tweak an individual string.

All that said, I never had a problem with Gibson/Epiphone 3-Point Tune-O-Matic bridges either, once you do a little fine tuning.

Am I missing something?
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Babicz FCH Rickenbacker Bass Bridge

Post by henry5 »

I have to agree that in light of the V2, it seems a bit of a waste of time to me. But hey, people like options and if it floats your boat,go for it. Anything I get in future that is post-original-aluminium tailpiece is going to get a V2, assuming it hasn’t already got one.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”