A peek inside.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

A peek inside.

Post by rickfan60 »

Did you ever wonder how those lead weights inside of some 70's Ricks look? The pic is a bit fuzzy but here is an example of how it was done.

Image

The weights were installed between the 4th and 5th frets and were intended to alter the resonance of the neck. The Goal was to reduce or eliminate less prominent notes. The board on top still has its weight but it has been removed from the board below.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Another mystery solved by the great Ted! When that fact first surfaced, I was curious where and how it was done, and how big it was. Thanks for sharing.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

my St Croix fishing pole has something like that...
Buy it before someone else does
User avatar
loverickbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1409
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:00 am

Post by loverickbass »

That's a new one on me. Never knew they did that. When did they stop?

Cole
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by s4001 »

Wow, that's a new one for me, too.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ken_j »

So the weight is actually on the bottom side of the fretboard. Not at all as I would have pictured it. Interesting. Thanks Ted. By chance did you weigh it?
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
morrow
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:09 pm

Post by morrow »

I had never heard of that being done before. Thank you for the insight. What years did Rick do this ? Was it common on both basses and guitars ? Is it still being done ?
drkknight
New member
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:21 am
Contact:

Post by drkknight »

I, too, never knew of this...you learn something new and cool every day!
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I think the practice was abandoned in the late 70's or early 80's. No, I have not weighed it but I would say the fingerboard with the lead is 3 to 4 ounces heavier than the other.

Another thing to take note of there is that the truss rod spacing changed. The board with the weight is from a '75. The other was from a '77 or '78. See the difference in the distance between the marks left by the rods? I don't know why that change occurred but it is certainly significant. perhaps it was another approach to changing the resonanace of the neck.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Post by rickenbrother »

The 4001's where born with Heavy Metal in them, made to rock!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

Could it be the lead weights went away with the new truss rods?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”