4003 Hipshot bridge .

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
59jazz
Junior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:06 pm

4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by 59jazz »

Is there a difference in weight between the 2014 4003 oem bridge and the Hipshot replacement bridge?
Thanks!
On the verge of a nervous breakthrough.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by aceonbass »

All of the die cast tailpiece/bridge assemblies from 1973 are the same dimensionally. That said, the Hipshot isn't as low as the stock bridge when bottomed out. So, maybe the Hipshot will get the action as low as you want it, and maybe it won't. Remember, the stock bridge sits below the deck on the front of the bass in a pocket, while the Hipshot saddles sit on a 1/8" thick plate on top of the body.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by aceonbass »

Ahh.....I thought you said height. Oh well...since Hipshot makes these in brass and aluminum, the aluminum one would be closest in weight to the stock part. However, what I said about height adjustability still applies.
User avatar
Badanovski
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:19 pm

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by Badanovski »

I tried the aluminum hipshot on my 4003. The hipshot was lighter & the bass neck dived.
User avatar
59jazz
Junior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:06 pm

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by 59jazz »

Great info...thanks guys! Guess I'm stickin' with the oem bridge.
On the verge of a nervous breakthrough.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by teeder »

I had an aluminum one on a V63 and gigged it that way for over a year. I did not have a neck-heavy issue with it and the tone was much improved.
bassman4001
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:36 am
Contact:

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by bassman4001 »

I have one on my 4001 and it is down low. No problems with any neck diving. Better action and sustains better. I have one to put on my 4003. I expect the same performance.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4454
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by woodyng »

Badanovski wrote:I tried the aluminum hipshot on my 4003. The hipshot was lighter & the bass neck dived.
When i received my aluminum hipshot,i did a "hand-to-hand" weight comparison with the presumably Oem bridge off my '74 4000. They felt extremely similar in weight. I never experienced any neck dive as a result of the change,the hipshot has been on the bass for about 6 years now i reckon. The action is as low as i would ever want it to be as well.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by rickaddict »

teeder wrote:I had an aluminum one on a V63 and gigged it that way for over a year. I did not have a neck-heavy issue with it and the tone was much improved.

BALDERDASH!!


No bridge is better than the stock bridge!

8)
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by teeder »

Who are you again and why are you here?

:lol:
User avatar
59jazz
Junior Member
Posts: 115
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 9:06 pm

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by 59jazz »

Just got my new 4003 MG from Bruce @ Wildwood last night.....Think I'm going to leave the bridge and tuners alone....at 9.3 lbs with my 2.5" LEVYS strap, it feels lighter than 9lbs. Such a sexy lookin' beast!
On the verge of a nervous breakthrough.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by rickaddict »

There ya go, Stephen! Why not give it a shot as is. Those OEM Schaller tuners are great, BTW.

Enjoy it, and congratulations.

8)
Gilmourisgod
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:26 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by Gilmourisgod »

So what's the verdict on new Rick production 4003 bridges, tail lift or no tail lift? Not looking for an argument or trolling (got personally flamed by John Hall for bringing this up once before!), just genuinely curious. Since the extra 2 rear screw version was nixed, I'm wondering if this has finally been fixed? I think this is partly what's driving the market for Hipshots. Regarding brass vs. aluminum, I would have thought the brass would enhance sustain better, any feedback on that from someone who's tried both? Does the chrome finish hold up on these bridges?
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6551
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by bassduke49 »

Depends on your criteria for "lift." On current production models, in almost every case, there is a tiny bit of "lift" of the back end of the tailpiece - enough that you could probably slip a credit card underneath the edges. There are some who believe this is a problem, and others who understand that it makes no difference in the performance of the tailpiece or instrument. Now, there are some cases where the tailpiece (usually older ones from the late '70s) that lift much more than this, but seem to have stabilized and not gotten worse. Then there are some of the powder-coated black ones from the late '80s and '90s that were supposedly weakened by the powder-coating process (baking?) and some of those REALLY lifted, especially those under extra strain (5-string, 8-string). The most famous documented case was the original tailpiece on Gary Clauson's five-string Blackstar which bent up nearly 90º !!! Realizing the problem, RIC began to add two more screws to the back end of the tailpiece. I believe they eventually made a new mold for the tailpiece that allowed reinforcement of the castings, and eventually stopped using the two extra screws.

So, long story short, if you're looking at a bass made in the last decade or so, there might be a tiny bit of lift, but it is stable and is not a problem.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
Gilmourisgod
Member
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:26 am

Re: 4003 Hipshot bridge .

Post by Gilmourisgod »

Thanks Paul, as usual, you know all the ins and outs. Have you considered writing a book on the subject........? Say........Wait a minute! What's that book in you avatar?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”