4005xc production numbers?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

TTA
New member
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 2:03 pm

4005xc production numbers?

Post by TTA »

Last week ric facebook said they were making 4005xc’s again.

Any idea how many are being produced? I had my name put on one (the last of maybe 5 fireglo that long and mequade ordered). Also wondering how quickly they pump them out… aka will i get mine in 2023?
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by lumgimfong »

Only Ric could say.
I’d love a short scale bass from Ric and been waitin for years.
But at 5k+US$ I must pass.
Let us know if they are worth it and please post pics and sound clips.
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12522
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by doctorwho »

IIRC, in one of the other threads here on the 90th Anniversary models it is mentioned that there are 90 of each being made.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by rickinroma »

it is likely that in the end the 4005XC production will outnumber the figures of the original 4005 due to the higher visibility that the modern marketing provides
however, its price is outrageous and unjustified in my opinion
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jdogric12 »

I don't think the production was limited in number, only in order time. There may well be a lot of these. I gigged with mine Saturday night and I have to say it was easy on the shoulder for 3 hours. The nice soft flats I put on it didn't hurt either. When RIC was taking orders, I remember them saying they'd be out by the end of this year. I'm still waiting for my 480XC, so I hope that's true!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6650
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by aceonbass »

rickinroma wrote:it is likely that in the end the 4005XC production will outnumber the figures of the original 4005 due to the higher visibility that the modern marketing provides
however, its price is outrageous and unjustified in my opinion
The actual price that many I know are actually paying is closer to $4k. There are plenty of handmade US built guitars and basses that go for more with a way lower cool factor.
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6231
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by cheyenne »

John Hall has said many times that a "modern" 4005 would be expensive.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1090
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by rickinroma »

cheyenne wrote:John Hall has said many times that a "modern" 4005 would be expensive.
That is why they just conceived a 4-strings 330 LOL
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jdogric12 »

Makes sense. And everyone I know that has one loves theirs. I know I do!
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by lumgimfong »

What is the measurement from the inside of the nut to the center of the 12th fret?

Looks like a 330 body though and not a 4005 body so why do they call it a 4005? Is it just a 330 with a bass neck?

Is it a neck thru semi hollow or a hollow?
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10854
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jdogric12 »

15 1/4" , so it's a 30 1/2" scale. There is X bracing and a center block. I think calling it 4005 is more for hype and marketing reasons (and understandable), and is mitigated by the XC. A rose by any other name, right?
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by collin »

lumgimfong wrote:What is the measurement from the inside of the nut to the center of the 12th fret?

Looks like a 330 body though and not a 4005 body so why do they call it a 4005? Is it just a 330 with a bass neck?

Is it a neck thru semi hollow or a hollow?
Technically, since it's bound, this is a 360 body with a bass neck.

Since the only other semi-hollow bass models are the 4005, I can only assume that was the linear thinking of including the XC model as part of that series. I'll agree that it's somewhat misleading to those who don't understand the context of the model names since the beginning.

Over the history of this brand, Rickenbacker model names have followed specifications -- not body shapes. For example, a 360 was originally the Capri body shape, then it was revised in 1961 to the double bound "new Capri" and then became the rounded-top "New Style" in 1964 --- and all three are technically 360 models, despite having drastically different body shapes.
User avatar
lumgimfong
Intermediate Member
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:57 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by lumgimfong »

Thanks for the info y'all.
So it is a true shortscale after all. Very nice.
I have committed to only buying shortscales from now on. My hands don't like long scales anymore.
I am sure it is a very nice sounding and playing bass.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37139
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by jps »

For the record, 4005s are fully hollow body with X-bracing.
Last edited by jps on Wed Oct 06, 2021 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6949
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 4005xc production numbers?

Post by collin »

lumgimfong wrote:Thanks for the info y'all.
So it is a true shortscale after all. Very nice.
I have committed to only buying shortscales from now on. My hands don't like long scales anymore.
I am sure it is a very nice sounding and playing bass.

I have to say that the short scale is one of the aspects I like about these basses the most.

I'm primarily a guitar player, and have fairly short arms so I appreciate not having a full length neck on there.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”