Refinishing a '66 345-Q
Moderator: jingle_jangle
Refinishing a '66 345-Q
Mark,
Have you ever heard of a 345-Q ? It is handwritten
in red letters inside the body. Peter McCormack has dated it as a 1966 model. The owner said it originally was a sunburst type paint job, but it was really worn out so he varnished it. I have sanded it all off and am ready to paint but I need more info on Rickenbacker's paint process in '66. My brother is a professional auto painter, and will do all the actual painting, but he wants me to find out what kind of paint to use, and also what order they laid it out. Also, any paint code numbers or color information would be much appreciated. Thanks
Have you ever heard of a 345-Q ? It is handwritten
in red letters inside the body. Peter McCormack has dated it as a 1966 model. The owner said it originally was a sunburst type paint job, but it was really worn out so he varnished it. I have sanded it all off and am ready to paint but I need more info on Rickenbacker's paint process in '66. My brother is a professional auto painter, and will do all the actual painting, but he wants me to find out what kind of paint to use, and also what order they laid it out. Also, any paint code numbers or color information would be much appreciated. Thanks
I had a friend who owned a '66 33-12 some years back, and inside this guitar, it was inscribed,
345 S 12.Well, it was Not a 3 PU Rick, and neither did it have a vibrato on it.But this one was odd, in that[and I've Never seen or heard of this before or since] as it was a 330-12, with No
binding on neck, or inlays, but it had the Front edge bound and Not the back, and also had a bound catseye soundhole.
345 S 12.Well, it was Not a 3 PU Rick, and neither did it have a vibrato on it.But this one was odd, in that[and I've Never seen or heard of this before or since] as it was a 330-12, with No
binding on neck, or inlays, but it had the Front edge bound and Not the back, and also had a bound catseye soundhole.
Just yodel at this site and he comes running ....or go to
jhall@rickenbacker.com
tell him we sent you
jhall@rickenbacker.com
tell him we sent you
So you too want yours "ALAPWOB"?!?!
here's a pic of a '64 RM1997 that I recently snapped in a friends workshop prior to it's refinish back to fg. Note the internal designation as a 345. Seems a very common thing.
http://www.geocities.com/g7sus4/641997cl.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/g7sus4/641997cl.jpg
I own a 1967 Ric 12 string that cosmetically looks like a 330/12. Inside the body cavity three inspectors have signed their names and/or initials and written the number 345/12X. This is all under the finish over spray, so I am sure it is original. I have been puzzled by this for years, as this guitar has no serial number on the jackplate; it is a bare metal bench part. I dated the guitar from the volume and tone pots which are Jan 67. I find this confusing but I can't believe the markings don't mean anything.
John: Yes it would seem that there are many instances of lettering inside that are inconsistent with the instrument in question. It is a shame as this would be a great opportunity to record important information with regard to the Rickenbacker that has just been crafted. I am wondering if this practice of lettering inside instruments is currently taking place.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277