Dear Mr. Hall

kennyhowes · Post by **kennyhowes** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:35 am

McGuinn did the intro to MTM, didn't he? (I always heard he was the only Byrd to actually play on the record...)

admin · Post by **admin** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 11:01 am

Kenny: You are correct, McGuinn did the intro.

360dave660 · Post by **360dave660** » Wed Aug 13, 2003 10:24 pm

I think that Glen Cambell did some initial touring and then turned down a full role in the band, opening the door to Bruce Johnson.

iamthebassman · Post by **iamthebassman** » Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:47 am

Just saw GC on TV playing "Galveston". It was live and he still plays and sings great. He played a beat-up Strat. His other guitarist played a Dano 6-string bass for the solo.

kennyhowes · Post by **kennyhowes** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:00 am

Anyway, back to the original question: I've been helping John out on his recording projects, and managed to bring home a couple of snapshots, which are now here for your perusal.

aceonbass · Post by **aceonbass** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:08 am

Which one are you? The tree or the folder?

kennyhowes · Post by **kennyhowes** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:19 am

Sorry the pics are so tiny.

Dane: huh?

aceonbass · Post by **aceonbass** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:33 am

Having just gone back to your post, I see the pics now. At first all I saw was a pair of the little "Post your picture here" icons with the tree pic coming outta the folder. Hmmm...must be the blaster worm affecting my 'puter.

melibreits · Post by **melibreits** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:51 am

Kenny, can you enlarge those pics a bit? I think I need a magnifying glass, but those look like some cool guitars!

kennyhowes · Post by **kennyhowes** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 7:07 am

I would love to, but the pics have to be a certain (small!) size to be posted here. Peter?

melibreits · Post by **melibreits** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 8:00 am

I think they can be a maximum of 35K.... I'm not sure how many pixels that translates to.

aladams · Post by **aladams** » Sat Aug 30, 2003 4:09 pm

just my 2 cents: I don't think it'll take anything larger than 500 x 500 and That's too bad.

mortivan · Post by **mortivan** » Sun Aug 31, 2003 4:49 am

Pete kicked up the image file size limit a few months ago. It's more than adequate to display anything with great detail (well, maybe not display wallpaper!) if you have the ability to control the compression ratio.

If you need an image posted, send it to mortivanATwideopenwestDOTcom and I'll do it for you. Just don't send it to my Yahoo address!

admin · Post by **admin** » Mon Sep 01, 2003 3:34 am

The current limit is 36K exact and 500 X 500 pixels. The rationale for this is two threefold. First, it allows for a reasonable download time as not everyone is on high speed internet as yet. Second, 500 X 500 does not displace the right page frame and so it is easier to read and navigate. Third, over an extended period this information accumulates which translates quickly into increased costs.

kennyhowes · Post by **kennyhowes** » Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:55 am

Pics blown up now appearing at ../6/9250.html"MB">