All that's left.....
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
New cameras...I've been hankering after one of these for studio work...now that I'm setting up my studio and they've come down in price to be affordable, I picked a mint one up on the bay for way under $500.00:
It's a Sony DSC-F828. Terrific camera and a good companion to my next-one-down, a DSC-F717. I'm working on getting through the 117-page owner's manual this year.
Bought my wife the Sony equivalent of that Canon (10MB point and shoot) and it's terrific for her people/places pics.
It's a Sony DSC-F828. Terrific camera and a good companion to my next-one-down, a DSC-F717. I'm working on getting through the 117-page owner's manual this year.
Bought my wife the Sony equivalent of that Canon (10MB point and shoot) and it's terrific for her people/places pics.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
― Kurt Vonnegut
Save at 72 dpi and then size to 500 x 500 and then jpeg compress to 35K and you get nice sized pictures without macro blocking. Anything over 72 dpi is extra resolution you don't need for display on computer screens.
What would be even better would be an IMG forum code tag that supported photo host site-hosted JPEG display directly (which would mean no file size restriction).
What would be even better would be an IMG forum code tag that supported photo host site-hosted JPEG display directly (which would mean no file size restriction).
Listen to that sustain!
