Townshend's new "Computer Music" project

Off Topic discussion forum

Moderators: ajish4, cjj

Post Reply
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Townshend's new "Computer Music" project

Post by doctorwho »

Rocker Townshend unveils song composing software

By Sylvia Westall Wed Apr 25, 6:45 PM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - British rocker Pete Townshend on Wednesday unveiled an Internet-based software program that will help music fans compose personalized tracks at the click of a button.

The Who guitarist/songwriter said that with a voice recording, a digital image and a rhythm clapped into a microphone, his new "Method" software will create spontaneous digital music and allow anyone to be a composer, and possibly a rock star.

"You can put data in and get a piece of music out. It's as simple as that," said Townshend, a technical wizard who pioneered the use of the synthesizer more than 35 years ago on the classic tunes "Won't Get Fooled Again" and "Baba O'Riley."

The project, which started percolating during his art school days in the 1960s, was developed by mathematician/composer Lawrence Ball and software developer Dave Snowdon.

From May 1, users will be able to get free access to the Web site (http://www.lifehouse-method.com) for three months, and will be able to compose instrumental tracks that they can e-mail or post on their Web sites. From August 1, it will become a subscription-based service.

Composers such as Townshend and Ball will also take some of the tracks and add instruments and rhythms, to create more complex pieces that could become the basis of future albums.

"It represents a whole new level of rock integration, blending rock and psychedelia with classical and experimental music," Ball said.

Townshend said he hopes the Web site will enable more people to become composers and said it was part of a growing trend towards using the internet to create and distribute music.

He joked that even his girlfriend's dog could inspire music using the software, likening the composing process to sitting for a portrait.

"I as a composer would try to get something out of this dog that would give me the chance to turn the dog into music," he said.

"I might listen to the way it breathes, I might touch it and see how it feels, I might listen to its bark, I might look at the rhythm of his running.

Townshend said he hoped members of the site would share their copyrights.

Reuters
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070425/wr_nm/townshend_dc_1

So, is this really music composition, or not?
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Well, it's hard to say without having seen or used the software first-hand, Gary. But for someone like me - who has been studying "music composition" for four years now - it just seems cheap.

Again, i'd like to see or use the software first hand before I pass judgement. The article describes it in painfully vague terms.
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

It's not composition, it's filling in the blanks or button-pushing. It's a paint-by-numbers set.
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

The Who By Numbers
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Good to see Pete has a girlfriend who has a dog.

It would seem that he likes dogs. So do I. My dogs love music, even mine. Image
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

Bobby "Blue" Bland - "I Wouldn't Treat a Dog the Way you Treated Me"

Sorry, I still haven't decided whether my uncanny ability to think of a song for every occasion is a blessing, or a curse!!
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

JB, I was hoping you'd see this. From reading some of your other posts, you seem to have a firm grasp on keys/modes/etc. Could a computer 'create' a song based on a finite set of rules based on keys, modes, and whatever other relevant aspects of music theory apply, without the intervention of the human ear? I'm thinking that a certain combination of chords might be good according to theory but would sound 'off' to a human listener.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Well, this would have to be an extremely complicated program - one that just falls short of "knowing what sounds good".

I suppose something could be written with a predetermined set of chord progressions, melodic motifs, and rhythmic motifs for different keys, time signatures, tempos, etc. Which sort of eliminates the need for ANY musical skill, knowledge, ear, or human involvement. Which is sort of where this whole thing loses me.

I feel like non-musical people have already gotten into the composition thing, especially with modern dance/house/techno music, where it's all sequenced on a program like Frooty Loops, without even the need for a keyboard.

How much more dumbed-down can things actually get?
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

It's not a far leap from Band-In-A-Box now!
Post Reply

Return to “The Others: by CJ Johansson”