RIC 330-12 vs 360-12

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
gt5litre
New member
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 10:11 pm

RIC 330-12 vs 360-12

Post by gt5litre »

I had a 67 330-12 got rid of it to pay wife's medical bills. What are sonic diff's between the two? I am thinking of vintage pickups. How do the vintage RI pickups to the HI-Gains? I do not have a local dealer who stocks any Rics nor any used to play in the area. I live in the Ozarks of Missouri; way out in the boonies.
Any assistance would be appreciated. Have great week

Brent
gt5litre
"All that I ask is that for peace. You fight today, you fight today"
lshaia
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 6:15 am

Post by lshaia »

Hi, Brent. Under subject 5.20 of the following link John Hall talks briefly about the differences between the 330 and the 360.

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/music/guitars/rickenbacker/
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Welcome Brent. I am hoping you will get a lot of responses from those who own both models. A great question. Lindsay has kindly provided the link. Here are John Hall's comments on the subject.
"Well, the 330 is a bit more acoustic, and that is reflected
somewhat in the plugged-in sound. The 360 has quite a bit more
wood at the edges, while the 330 is routed out quite a bit
more. This is just a guess, but the interior air volume of a 330
is probably 15% greater than a 360, and only some of that comes
from having a fully developed lower bout. It's not a huge
difference but it IS noticeable."

[John Hall, [email protected], 1/14/2000]
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
User avatar
melibreits
Senior Member
Posts: 4081
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by melibreits »

Brent, I have both a 330/12 and a 360/12 and there is a little bit of difference in the sound, but it is not a huge difference. The 330 is just a little bit fuller and more resonant-sounding; the 360 is a little bit janglier. Although part of that may be due to the strings; I have a set of Pyramid flatwounds on the 360. They sound wonderful, but they sure are hard on the fingers! Niether of my 12-strings have the vintage pickups, although I have a couple of other Rics that have them, and they sound wonderful (my 1967 360/6 is my personal favorite). However, both of my Ric 12-strings are great guitars, and there is certainly nothing wrong with the hi-gain pickups on them.... I am sure you'll be happy with whatever model you choose.
"Once I've held and played the best, baby, I won't settle for less!"
riffmeister

Post by riffmeister »

Brent, I was RIC 12-string shopping recently and had a chance to play several 360's side-by-side with hi-gains and vintage toaster pickups. I found the toasters to have more mid & upper mid presence than the hi-gains. The toasters sounded a bit more "raw" and "lo-fi" and the hi-gains sounded a bit more "refined" and "delicate". With both pickup types, however, there was no mistaking that magical Rickenbacker sound. I could be happy with either type.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”