I agree, it could be just a moment pictured right before it was taken to be sanded.....simer4001 wrote:I think the bass was sanded during the LIB sessions. He had it completely sanded in Soho. I would think that the previous picture was before the work was done. Just a guess.leftybass wrote:That last pic taken during the LIB/Get Back sessions above shows that Paul only had the front of the bass sanded off at first, for the neck and peghead are still Fireglow. Cool.
Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Re: Re:
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Interesting little detail in those Ram session pics... looks like a polishing cloth or some such rag folded up under the strings between the HS and bridge. Maybe he's recording 'Oh Woman, Oh Why', 'cause I always thought that song featured a very heavily muted bass tone.
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Good observation! I'd never seen those RAM pics. Sort of glad I started this thread as I'd never seen the vast majority of these images. 

Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Probably fall 75 into 75 when Jimmy joined-Juniors Farm was his first.
It really is an amazing bass. I would love Ric to put out a MMT painted model.
It is the holy grail (or at least one of them).
It really is an amazing bass. I would love Ric to put out a MMT painted model.
It is the holy grail (or at least one of them).
- actual_size
- New member
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 3:30 pm
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Here is a shot of the bass around 1970. After the original sanding, but before the horns were shaven.
- actual_size
- New member
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 3:30 pm
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Full page ad from the April 25, 1970 issue of Billboard.
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
I wonder how Paul managed to nick a chunk off the lower bout of his pickguard as shown in the photos....it's a fairly flexible piece of material, and it's in such an odd spot-- how in the heck could that have happened? A too-tightened screw? I can understand the tip of a TRC getting caught on something and breaking, but this?? (I'm convinced the broken pickguard is the secret to Macca's sound, ala Eric Johnson who seemingly swears a piece of lint on his strat alters his tone).
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
My guess is, for some reason, they attempted to remove the guard without unscrewing that screw location.
- rickinroma
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1096
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
Considering how they kept their instruments even in the studio...without gutar stands....down on the floor or in the best cases just using their amp cabinet as a stand... no wonderjojo99 wrote: I wonder how in the heck could that have happened?

Ricks and other beatle instruments are like the holy grail for us feticist beatlemaniacs...at that time they were just objects for them
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
I wonder if we could pin point down when the cracked guard happened by dating the pictures?
May not be enough pictures from that time frame though.
May not be enough pictures from that time frame though.
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
I would say very early on. Perhaps 1965-66. I remember Paul quoted as saying the guitars were not really handled with care and that Mal did drop his Ric.
- revolver323
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 997
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
- Contact:
Re: Rare Photo - McCartney Plays 4001S
In all my years of playing in clubs, I didn't use a bass stand until the last three. Just flip it around and lean it against the amp. I don't think I ever laid it on a floor, though. Of all the Beatles, I think George was probably the most likely to have treated his guitars well. However, McCartney still has his Hofner, Casino and the Texan.rickinroma wrote:
Considering how they kept their instruments even in the studio...without gutar stands....down on the floor or in the best cases just using their amp cabinet as a stand... no wonder
Ricks and other beatle instruments are like the holy grail for us feticist beatlemaniacs...at that time they were just objects for them