Do you remove the bridge cover?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by JakeK »

This is something I saw on the official Ric forum, and we probably have a topic for it here, but do you remove the bridge cover on your Ric?

Until late December of '07, I didn't remove it from my 660/12 Tom Petty, because it didn't look right without it. But last week, when I was sending it to my tech for new strings (can't be bothered changing them myself), a neck adjustment and cleaning, a raise in the action and an intonation setting for the bridge, I decided to remove it so my tech wouldn't have to when he restrung it. I got it back yesterday, and I couldn't believe how much better it sounded without it! I still have the original cover and screws for it, but it sounds cooler without it, so off it shall remain!
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by sloop_john_b »

I'm not sure what kind of tonal difference it would make without it? You were probably hearing the guitar post-setup and that's what would have made the difference.

I take mine off, I like to palm mute.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by tennis_nick »

playing with the cover on doesn't make palm muting any tougher for me... and it looks cool... so... I'd leave it on.

Agreed with John, the sound diff has 0% to do with the cover not being on, unless you just smoked a big bag of placebo.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by sloop_john_b »

tennis_nick wrote:playing with the cover on doesn't make palm muting any tougher for me... and it looks cool... so... I'd leave it on.
I'm surprised you wouldn't notice a big difference, Nick, in regards to leaning on the bridge vs. leaning in front of the bridge. Leaning in front of the bridge alters the pitch for sure, and is much less comfortable. IMO of course.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by tennis_nick »

sloop_john_b wrote:
tennis_nick wrote:playing with the cover on doesn't make palm muting any tougher for me... and it looks cool... so... I'd leave it on.
I'm surprised you wouldn't notice a big difference, Nick, in regards to leaning on the bridge vs. leaning in front of the bridge. Leaning in front of the bridge alters the pitch for sure, and is much less comfortable. IMO of course.
It depends how you do it I suppose. I'm not big on palm muting anyways, but when I do (on a strat or Gibson) I always use a very minimal amount of pressure. for some reason, resting on the saddles doesn't feel as good as hovering over the string just in front of the bridge.
User avatar
goofyfoot
Intermediate Member
Posts: 976
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:31 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by goofyfoot »

sloop_john_b wrote:I'm not sure what kind of tonal difference it would make without it? You were probably hearing the guitar post-setup and that's what would have made the difference.

I take mine off, I like to palm mute.
+1 to what John says, although sometimes I take the cover off if the songs require more palm muting than normal. Otherwise, I leave it on. Regards....Goofyfoot.
Play on, pick often, jam with any Rickenbacker, and prosper.
User avatar
teb
Advanced Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:39 pm

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by teb »

I take mine off and leave them off, but only after the bridge and saddles have been properly smoothed-out and deburred like they used to be during the vintage days. Mr. Arnquist does a very nice job of this as part of the setup process.
chuck_king
Member
Posts: 228
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:12 pm

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by chuck_king »

I tried playing with the bridge cover in place when I got my new 330. It didn't interfere with palm muting, like I had suspected it might, but it did feel odd. Maybe I just wasn't used to it, but I took it off. I'm sure one day I'll try it again.
eggman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat May 26, 2001 3:09 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by eggman »

Howdy,

I'm a palm-muter and remove my bridge cover.

Eggman
User avatar
scott_s
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:59 pm

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by scott_s »

I just put mine back on! Love the cleaner look and I'm not much of a palm-muter anyway... :)

- Scott
User avatar
lennon211
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:13 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by lennon211 »

On my Rics that are more of the "show" type like my V-series, I have the covers on, with the exception of my RM1997. On my "workhorse" Rics like my 330 and 360/12, they come right off and the screws go back in the holes so that they don't get lost. I find that more of the songs that I play with these are the types that I need for finger muting.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by admin »

While the covers look nice, I appreciate the palm mute effect more and so mine are usually in the drawer, 12 string excepted.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
beefandbones
Intermediate Member
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:27 am

Re: Do you remove the bridge cover?

Post by beefandbones »

Well this is interesting to me. I like the look of the bridge cover so I've always kept the cover on my 330. However my 330 and my Victoria 5112 have had some trouble getting along together, and I've tried nearly everything in the book to make them get along. Rounds, flats, and EQ pedals for the guitar, a changed speaker for the amp, but the thing that helped the most, aside from the speaker change, was when I removed the bridge cover. It made my 330 sound much more alive and resonant, and I sure couldn't tell you why, scientifically speaking. The removal of the cover did not coincide with a change in the strings, or the change in the speaker by the way.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”