68 RIC 375

Early years of Rickenbacker Guitars prior to and including 1972

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by jingle_jangle »

The number of frets went from 21 to 24, sometime around '75-'76, presumably to satisfy players who wanted a bit more upper craziness. It was that time--players were stretching out a bit more.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by sloop_john_b »

Definitely earlier than that, Paul. I recall some 360's circa 1970 with 24-frets, bound headstocks, and crushed pearl inlays (remember those?).

With 330's, the change did happen around '75-'76. They weren't selling a ton of 300-series guitars in the 70's; I wouldn't be surprised if that stuff was basically leftover stock.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by leftybass »

brammy wrote:Thats obviously a re-wired Rick, right?
ric-slider.jpg
Yes, a long time ago but not by me. This is my '68. You can get tons of sounds out of it....it was a studio guitar in Nashville for years.
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

Nice rich coloring on this 370... not too "orangy" like some late model 360's I've seen

http://cgi.ebay.com/BRAND-NEW-2008-Rick ... 240%3A1318
z110708370fgnewbody.jpg
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

370jet_0489.jpg
Some 370's appear to have the fret inlays go completely across while some are the regular shorter style.
This doesn't appear to be a 6 vs 12 string thing, as I've seen it both ways.
Which models get which inlays?
370fg.jpg
370t.jpg
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by leftybass »

brammy wrote:
370jet_0489.jpg
Some 370's appear to have the fret inlays go completely across while some are the regular shorter style.
This doesn't appear to be a 6 vs 12 string thing, as I've seen it both ways.
Which models get which inlays?
370fg.jpg
370t.jpg
It has everything to do with when the guitars were made.....not so much model-specific.

The top pic is a new guitar from 2008 (full-width), while the other pics are guitars that have the style used from around 1973 until 2007.

Vintage deluxe Rickenbacker guitars from 1972 and earlier have full-width inlays of different material...mainly crushed-pearl, but this varies too the farther you go back.
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

thanks much.
My humble opinion is that the shorter inlays look a lot nicer than the full width.
User avatar
1965
Advanced Member
Posts: 1607
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:01 pm

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by 1965 »

jingle_jangle wrote:The number of frets went from 21 to 24, sometime around '75-'76, presumably to satisfy players who wanted a bit more upper craziness. It was that time--players were stretching out a bit more.
Also supposedly to reinforce the neck joint. Personally, I think 24 frets + 3 pickups = absolutely hideous.
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

yup.... 21 frets rocks.
Some people may find a use for those teeny weeny 22nd-24th frets, but I aint one of them.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by JakeK »

24 frets ain't for me. Sorry, I'm mostly a rhythm player, so I have no use for the 3 extra frets. Really, I have no use for anything beyond the 12th fret.
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

JakeK wrote:24 frets ain't for me. Sorry, I'm mostly a rhythm player, so I have no use for the 3 extra frets. Really, I have no use for anything beyond the 12th fret.
yup me too.... well, the 13 and 14 and 15th come in handy occasionally, but any more than 21 is a waste of arm reach
... and LOOK of the guitar
User avatar
brammy
Senior Member
Posts: 5074
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by brammy »

If 21 was good enough for Johnny, 21 is good enough for me
If 21 was good enough for Johnny, 21 is good enough for me
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by jps »

If 21 was good enough for Johnny, 21 is good enough for me
Johnny didn't have a choice! :wink:
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by 37012player »

brammy wrote:Thats obviously a re-wired Rick, right?
ric-slider.jpg
Hmmm 3 tone pots and a progressive Strat type fader?

Rick prototype or retro indeed?

Si........
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 68 RIC 375

Post by sloop_john_b »

leftybass wrote:
brammy wrote:Thats obviously a re-wired Rick, right?
ric-slider.jpg
Yes, a long time ago but not by me. This is my '68. You can get tons of sounds out of it....it was a studio guitar in Nashville for years.
AWESOME guitar. 8)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Vintage Years - Before 1973”