McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Those who flock to The Byrds
Post Reply
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by 37012player »

I've already posted this elsewhere but thought the Byrds fans here might be interested as well.

I have been researching Roger McGuinn's first Rick 12 for a while now. Here we have a comparison of his first 64, his second 66 and two modern 360/12 head stocks.

I understand that the profile was standardised sometime after his first rick was produced in early 65 through to 68.

Si.......

Image
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by jimk »

Very interesting. Thanks for posting this.

JimK
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by doctorwho »

jimk wrote:Very interesting. Thanks for posting this.

JimK
+1! :)

I wonder how a 370/12RM headstock compares ... probably the same as the modern-era profiles, I'd guess.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
rick36
Member
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:00 am

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by rick36 »

Here's a photo, I think it's like the older '64 - '66. Rickenbacker/John Hall would have the shop drawings...
img04.jpg
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by deaconblues »

Nah, that's a fat-head.

Here's a '67:
EX0940h.jpg
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by 37012player »

The RM limited Edition Head Stock was very similar if not the same as the V64, and the Japan only V66 360/12 and V67 370/12. Only 12 of each of these Japanese models was ever made, yet I read occasionally that 24 of each was made...incorrectly... based on a discussion I had in Japan a few years ago.

The V67 was basically the RM without standard controls and no signature pick guard.

Some early publicity photos of RM with his signature guitar were actually an early 70's model totally refurbished as a prototype before the RM's came out of the factory and hence have the earlier Low Fat head stock like the 60's models.

Hope this helps,

Si...........
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by 37012player »

Oh, and one dead give away with the early 12's was that the tuners were not spaced evenly like the current CNC machined re-issues.

RM's first rick 12 is a classic example, with the Octave G being spaced much higher for some reason. Jigs improved and it was all pretty much standardised by 65 through to 68.

Those early rick 12's are all pretty special by virtue of being unique.

Si..
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by JakeK »

37012player wrote:The RM limited Edition Head Stock was very similar if not the same as the V64, and the Japan only V66 360/12 and V67 370/12. Only 12 of each of these Japanese models was ever made, yet I read occasionally that 24 of each was made...incorrectly... based on a discussion I had in Japan a few years ago.

The V67 was basically the RM without standard controls and no signature pick guard.

Some early publicity photos of RM with his signature guitar were actually an early 70's model totally refurbished as a prototype before the RM's came out of the factory and hence have the earlier Low Fat head stock like the 60's models.

Hope this helps,

Si...........
Wouldn't a Carl Wilson headstock be the same as the 370/12RM, 360/12V64, 360/12V66 and 370/12V67?
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: McGuinn Head Stock Comparison

Post by 37012player »

Jake,

I think your right,as they are from the same era, but Im not certain.
Post Reply

Return to “Byrds' Forum: by James Krause”